Council of Canadians protests ‘NAFTA on steroids’

https://i0.wp.com/media.bclocalnews.com/images/NanamioNewsBulletin-2013-Horizontal-Colour-Nameplate.gif

By Chris Bush – Nanaimo News Bulletin
Published: September 10, 2013 3:00 PM

Leaks of draft copies of Trans Pacific Partnership negotiations have sparked consternation among Nanaimo members of the Council of Canadians.

Council of Canadians Mid Island Chapter held a rally last week to protest secrecy surrounding the negotiations and information obtained from leaked draft copies drawn from those negotiations.

The Trans Pacific Partnership trade agreement is currently being hammered out among 12 Pacific Rim countries.

The rally, lead by activist Paul Manly, in front of Nanaimo-Alberni MP James Lunney’s constituency office in north Nanaimo Aug. 29 drew about 25 people.

Manly said that the proposed trade agreement has little do with trade and is primarily an attempt to establish international corporate rights, copyright of intellectual property, patent extension, how the internet is governed, how personal information is shared across borders, and international banking and taxation rules, among other issues.

He said one of the more disturbing aspects of the agreement involves how investors should be compensated when public health and environment policies interfere with projects and profits. For instance, if a proposed mining project is halted over such concerns, the corporation paying for the project could sue the government of the country or province for loss of potential profits.

“The worst chapters in the Trans Pacific Partnership have to do with the corporate rights agreement part of it which allow corporations to sue governments for laws measures and policies that inhibit what corporations can do,” Manly said. “They can sue for loss of potential profit – not real profit, but potential profit.”

Manly cited a chapter in the North American Free Trade Agreement under which a Canadian company is suing the Canadian government, through its branch office in Delaware, because the Quebec government has put a moratorium on fracking in the St. Lawrence region.

“They want to know whether the technology is safe before they destroy the water table in the St. Lawrence,” Manly said. “So we have a $250-million lawsuit. We got almost $5 billion worth of lawsuits on the books now under Chapter 11 in NAFTA and with the Trans Pacific Partnership with CETA – the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement – we are going to see a lot more of these law suits from corporations suing for the loss of potential profits.”

Costs of all that litigation will ultimately be footed by taxpayers of nations their governments are trying to protect, he said.

The rally ended up being more of a quiet discussion among those gathered than a loud protest.

One of the key sentiments voiced by several people attending the rally was a desire for action to find ways to prevent what some fear is potential corporate hijacking of their national sovereignty.

“Talk is cheap,” said one woman in the group. “We can stand around and talk at rallies, but how do we organize to actually take action?”

TPP countries to negotiate tariffs in Washington late September

Kyodo News International

The 12 Pacific Rim countries involved in the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade negotiations are arranging a working group meeting on tariffs from Sept. 20 to 23 in Washington, negotiation sources said Wednesday.

The meeting of the market access working group that deals with tariff cuts and eliminations will likely coincide with the meeting of TPP chief negotiators, set to be held in Washington on Sept. 18-21, as the countries seek to facilitate the talks and conclude a deal by the year-end.

In addition, ministers of the TPP countries are expected to hold their own meetings on Oct. 3, 4 and 6, followed by a summit on Oct. 8, on the fringes of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum meeting in Bali, Indonesia, a government official said.

As the TPP countries agreed in late July to put 95 percent of their respective tariff lines on the negotiation table by Sept. 20, the upcoming working group meeting is likely to start with the presentation of proposed tariff-free items.

Japan exchanged a list of items with Brunei, New Zealand, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru and Singapore during the 19th round of TPP negotiations that ended in Brunei last week, but the percentage of tariff-free items remained relatively low at around 80 percent.

The five TPP countries that Japan has not exchanged the list with are Australia, Canada, Chile, Vietnam and the United States. Japan plans on holding bilateral tariff negotiations separate from the working group meeting as well.

The working group on intellectual property, covering patent terms of medicine, is also set to hold its meeting in Mexico in late September, while some other working groups may also hold their meetings around the time, one negotiation source said.

The Brunei round of TPP negotiations was likely the last full-scale negotiations held, with countries expected to focus on intersessional meetings involving only one or two working groups from now on.

Aiming for a comprehensive free trade agreement, the TPP negotiations cover 21 fields, ranging from government procurement rules for public works projects to environment that involves fishing subsidies.

==Kyodo

Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade : Trans-Pacific Partnership Members Advance Negotiations in Brunei

08/30/2013 | 12:33pm US/Eastern   http://www.4-traders.com

Opening new markets and creating new sources of prosperity the Harper government’s focus as Canada continues to play important role in negotiations 

August 30, 2013 – The Honourable Ed Fast, Minister of International Trade, today marked the conclusion of the 19th round of Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, which took place in Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei, from August 22 to 30, 2013. Minister Fast was in Brunei last week to participate in a meeting of all TPP trade ministers.

“Opening new markets and creating good jobs, economic growth and greater prosperity for Canadian workers and families is why our government is pursuing deeper trade and investment ties in the fast-growing and dynamic Asia-Pacific region,” said Minister Fast. “The TPP negotiations are a key pillar of our government’s pro-trade plan, and I am pleased that Canada is playing a constructive and important role as we work to advance our interests and conclude an ambitious agreement in a timely manner.”

During the 19th round, negotiators built on the progress made to date in several areas, including on goods market access, rules of origin, investment, services, financial services, temporary entry, intellectual property, government procurement and environment.

Officials also wrapped up a technical meeting on labour provisions, which was held in Ottawa from August 26 to 29, 2013.

Twelve countries are currently participating in the TPP negotiations: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam. Canada formally joined the negotiations on October 8, 2012.

The TPP market represents more than 792 million people and a combined GDP of $27.5 trillion-more than 38 percent of the world’s economy. An ambitious agreement that greatly reduces barriers to trade will benefit workers and families in every region of Canada by providing greater access for Canadian exporters to large, dynamic and fast-growing markets. And as Canada is at the international forefront of trade liberalization, the TPP will also improve Canada’s international competitiveness by solidifying our participation in lucrative trading blocs with fast-growing economies.

For more information, please visit Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement Negotiations.

For further information, media representatives may contact:

Rudy Husny
Press Secretary
Office of the Honourable Ed Fast
Minister of International Trade
613-992-7332
rudy.husny@international.gc.ca

TPP talks on tariffs advance as Brunei round ends

Kyodo News International               August 30, 2013

Japan and 11 other Pacific Rim countries wrapped up the 19th round of the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade negotiations in Brunei on Friday, saying they have advanced work on tariffs and other key subjects while agreeing to hold more working-level negotiations in coming weeks.

During the nine-day round since Aug. 22, Japan proposed eliminating tariffs on around 80 percent of imported products, and plans to raise the offer to over 90 percent in subsequent negotiations, sources said.

The 12 participating countries, including the United States, are now arranging a meeting of chief negotiators in Washington Sept. 18-21 as they pursue the goal of concluding a deal by a year-end deadline, according to Japanese officials.

The Brunei round was the last round of full-scale negotiations, with the countries now expected to focus on intersessional meetings involving only one or two working groups from now on, one source said.

In a statement released at the end of the Brunei round, the TPP countries said, “Negotiators advanced their technical work this round on the texts covering market access,” which deals with tariff cuts, and numerous other fields such as fishing subsidies and intellectual property.

Market access is one of the issues that Japan is keen to discuss as it faces strong domestic pressure to protect rice and four other sensitive farm products by retaining tariffs it levies on imports of those items.

Japan’s chief negotiator Koji Tsuruoka said at a press conference that the nation has held bilateral tariff negotiations with all TPP countries other than Chile and Peru this time.

Japan exchanged lists of proposals on tariff-free items with six countries — Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei, New Zealand, Mexico and Peru, a source familiar with the matter said.

The negotiations with the United States and Australia did not involve an exchange of a list of proposal on tariff-free items as the United States has said it can only table its offer in September while Australia awaits a general election on Sept. 7.

Tsuruoka indicated a plan to raise the ratio of tariff-free items, saying Japan’s counterparts who received its tariff proposals have said there is still much room for improvement.

Under the 13 existing free trade agreements concluded by Japan, the percentage of items on which Tokyo agreed to eliminate tariffs within 10 years ranges from 84.4 percent to 88.4 percent of the total.

If Japan agrees to abolish all tariffs other than those on its five key farm product categories — rice, wheat, beef and pork (counted as one), dairy products and sugar — the tariff-free percentage would rise to 93.5 percent.

The latest TPP statement also said, “Negotiators will meet again intersessionally in the coming weeks to further their work” toward the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum summit scheduled to be held in Bali, Indonesia, in early October.

The TPP countries have been aiming to reach a basic agreement in October and conclude a deal by the end of the year. Ministers of the 12 TPP members reaffirmed the target after meeting in the first two days of the Brunei round last week.

The countries involved in the TPP negotiations are Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam.

Japan only joined the TPP talks near the end of the Malaysia round held in July, and the latest Brunei round was the first full round it participated in.

The TPP negotiations stretch over 21 fields as the members are aiming for creation of a comprehensive free trade pact covering nearly 40 percent of global economic output and about a third of world trade. The latest round dealt with 10 of the fields.

While most of the working groups finished negotiations for this round, some are expected to continue their work through Saturday.

TPP sources have said some groups were not as successful as desired, including the one on the environment, which made less than 40 percent of the progress expected.

==Kyodo

Concerns Raised That TPP Negotiations Ensure Rights Of Countries Not Impinged On

By Andrew Chernoff    August 29, 2013 Just-saying

Some people in the host country of the 19th Round of Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) Negotiations in Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei are concerned about tobacco and the push by the United States and its’ tobacco multinational companies to water down nations’ rights to enact legislation or rules that discourage the use of tobacco products in the TPP participating countries.

In the August 29, 2013 edition of the Brunei Times newspaper, a letter to the editor raised a further concern that perhaps, it was not just tobacco that countries were being influenced to change their legislation or rules about.

The letter titled, “Solid stance or wishful thinking on TPP?”, the writer says:

“IN A Canadian paper dated August 27, 2013, it was stated that “The Americans, apparently at the behest of tobacco companies, are trying to water down nations’ rights to enact legislation or rules that discourage the use of tobacco products”.

Are tobacco companies the only ones doing this?

The letter from MoFAT published in your paper on the same date stated that “On the queries on whether the TPP will impinge upon Brunei Darussalam’s sovereignty, our accession to the TPP will not prevent us from continuing to apply our laws and regulations”.

“Watering down” national rights to enact certain kinds of legislation or rules would certainly lead to impingement of a country’s sovereignty.”

This concern is not just one the citizens of Brunei should be concerned about. Canadians should have the same concern, and with the secrecy that abounds with negotiations, and the fact that the Canadian government is determined to make the decision on the final look of the partnership agreement, all Canadians must make sure that our politicians inform us of the particulars of the agreement items and get feedback from the Canadian electorate before Parliament gives royal assent.

As one commenter to the article in the Brunei Times said, and I quote, “The public at large (society) needs to participate in this debate so governments can formulate better strategies to balance economic diversification efforts and protection of the public.”

I wholeheartedly agree. How about you?