Oil lurches closer to $20 Goldman Sachs doomsday forecast: ‘The supports are crumbling’

LONDON — When U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs said last year that oil could fall as low as US$20 per barrel, it assigned a fairly low probability to that scenario.

A deepening oil market slump is adding fresh pain for producers of the world’s cheapest crude as the Canadian heavy grade reached a record low, raising the prospect of more production coming offline.

Fast-forward five months and in some parts of the world the forecast has already proved correct. Canadian physical crude has been selling this week at below US$20 per barrel, less than it costs to extract and transport. Traders in the options market, meanwhile, are taking protection against prices falling below US$25.

The developments reflect growing concerns that a market already awash in too much oil is now suffering the double-whammy of a sharp slowdown in U.S. and Chinese demand.

For the past 18 months, oversupply has been the main factor responsible for dragging down prices by two-thirds, after Saudi Arabia pushed OPEC to ramp up exports to fight for market share with higher-cost producers such as U.S. shale firms.

Low prices spurred global demand to multi-year highs, saving oil from a further collapse and encouraging producers to hope that the market might recover later in 2016.

But just as Saudi Arabia was about to start celebrating its first tactical victories, with U.S. output declining under pressure from low prices, signs are emerging that demand in the United States, China and Europe is much weaker than anticipated.

Estimated demand from China, the world’s second largest consumer and the engine of global economic growth since the commodities boom started in the early 2000s, fell in both September and November, compared to the same months of 2014.

U.S. demand, the world’s largest, began falling from October, according to the latest available data, despite low gasoline prices, while U.S. distillate demand slid to its lowest for more than a decade towards the end of 2015.

Demand in the European Union turned flat in October, having surprised on the upside throughout most of the year.

“2015 started off with a spectacular growth in demand. But in the last quarter of 2015, things seem to have changed,” said Abhishek Deshpande, an analyst at banking and investment group Natixis.

“SUPPORTS CRUMBLING”

Goldman’s drastic scenario was based on the logic that the market might have to undergo a US$20 per barrel price shock in order to force an acceleration in the shutdown of unprofitable production.

That no longer seems fanciful.

“Oil has been under pressure as of late, and downside risks of a dip into the US$20s have grown,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch said on Thursday.

The same day, Brent and WTI futures fell briefly to their lowest levels since 2004, near US$32 per barrel, as a sliding yuan and an emergency halt in Chinese stock market trading left Asian markets in turmoil.

Oil has been under pressure as of late, and downside risks of a dip into the US$20s have grown

For oil prices to fall as much as 5 per cent in early and usually calm Asian trading hours is very rare, and even veteran chart-watchers are now struggling to draw a line under the biggest rout in decades.

“The supports are crumbling… There is not a winning long in the market – maximum pain is lower. It is not advised to be long,” said Robin Bieber of brokers PVM.

He said there would not be much to stop oil falling into the mid-US$20s if WTI crude fell below the US$32.40 a barrel support level. Minutes later, WTI fell as low as US$32.10, although prices slightly recovered towards US$34 per barrel later in the day.

NEGATIVE OIL

Over the past year, the world has been producing 1.5 million bpd more oil than it consumes. OPEC and the International Energy Agency expect global demand growth to slow in 2016 to around 1.20-1.25 million barrels per day from a very high 1.8 million bpd in 2015.

That means that for most of 2016 the world will still be producing more than it can consume, adding to record stockpiles already exceeding 3 billion barrels.

The options market is showing that fears are indeed on the rise that futures could fall further. The Chicago Board Options Exchange’s oil volatility index has risen 20 per cent so far this year.

Implied volatility in ICE Brent options – including the US$30/barrel and US$25/barrel Feb 16 option – has spiked in recent weeks. Some investors are protecting themselves by acquiring put options giving them the right to sell at US$25, anticipating that Brent will fall below that.

“There has been more interest in buying options like US$25 puts and open interest has increased. Volatility has been rallying. The action that we have seen shows that people have a bearish slant,” said a senior options trader at a major bank.

But while the futures market is only preparing for a dip below US$30 per barrel, prices in the physical markets – where oil producers sell and refiners buy actual barrels – have already fallen much further.

The price of an OPEC basket of 13 crude grades fell to US$29.71 a barrel on Wednesday, according to calculations from the cartel.

Most shocking was the outright price of Canadian heavy crude, which dropped below UA$20 a barrel.

Northern Alberta’s vast oilsands hold the world’s third-largest crude reserves but carry some of the highest production costs globally — up to US$50 a barrel — because of the energy-intensive production process.

Most Canadian and U.S. companies will likely keep producing to pay bills and loans, even if the crude price does not cover cash operating costs such as extraction, blending and transportation.

“There is a high risk a lot of these companies could fold, but really speaking we are looking at more consolidation and potential restructuring,” Natixis analyst Deshpande said.

© Thomson Reuters 2016

Source: Oil lurches closer to $20 Goldman Sachs doomsday forecast: ‘The supports are crumbling’ | Financial Post

Freeport-McMoRan: A Roller Coaster Ride in November 2015

Market Realist
By Mark O’Hara

On November 13, 2015, Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) closed at $8.68. Although Freeport’s stock is down more than 25% so far in November, it is still trading ~12% above its 2015 lows. The year has been nothing short of a roller coaster ride for Freeport investors.

part 1

Stocks have been falling

The entire base metals space (XLB) has seen heightened volatility over the last six months or so. However, companies including Freeport-McMoRan, Teck Resources (TCK), and Glencore (GLNCY) have been more volatile as compared to some of their peers in this sector.

Teck Resources has seen its share price dwindle more than 65% this year. Teck Resources is the world’s second largest exporter of steelmaking coal. It is also North America’s largest coal producer, with the annual capacity to produce 28 million tons. Along with falling copper prices, Teck Resources has been hit by the reduced Chinese coal demand.

Freeport is not far behind, and its stock has fallen more than 62% this year. Southern Copper (SCCO) has not fallen much, as can be seen in the graph above. Please read Southern Copper: A Business Overview of a Copper Giant to learn more about SCCO.

Key drivers

There are several factors that would determine how Freeport-McMoRan could trade over the next few months. As Freeport is also involved in the energy exploration business, its stock price could also be guided by movement in energy prices. However, Freeport has announced that the company is looking at several “strategic alternatives” for the energy business, and a final decision has yet to be made.

The key driver, however, would be how copper prices play out in the coming months. In the next part of this series, we’ll explore what analysts think about copper prices.

Copper prices

Copper prices resumed their downside in November after remaining relatively strong in October. On November 13, 2015, the LME (London Metals Exchange) three-month copper contract closed at $4,810 per metric ton, losing more than 1% from the previous day’s closing.

So far in November, the LME three-month copper contract has lost ~6% and joined the ranks of other metals, including steel and aluminum, to hit fresh 2015 lows. The graph below shows the recent movement in copper prices.

How low can it get?

Goldman Sachs had earlier given a target of $4,800 per ton for copper by the end of December 2015. However, according to an October 8 Reuters report citing Max Layton, the head of European commodities research for Goldman Sachs, copper could even fall below $4,000 per metric ton.

A November 12, 2015, Reuters’ article, cited Axel Rudolph, technical analyst at London-based Commerzbank, who noted, “Copper is likely to extend losses in coming weeks to $4,397.”

Bears are back

Bears, it seems, are back full throttle in copper. The bearish sentiments surrounding copper faded somewhat a few weeks ago on supply cuts from Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) and Glencore (GLNCY). However, the goodwill failed to last beyond a month, and copper prices have resumed their downside.

While FCX and GLNCY have announced production cutbacks, diversified miners such as Rio Tinto (RIO) and BHP Billiton (BHP) don’t plan to cut their copper production. Both companies are among the low-cost copper producers, so it would make economic sense for these companies to keep mining copper from their mines.

Meanwhile, the concern has again shifted to the demand side of the equation. In the last week or so, there has been quite a bit of negative data from China, whether it is monthly trade data or credit activity. Pessimistic Chinese data is weighing heavily on copper prices. A stronger US dollar (UUP), on expectations of a possible Federal rate hike in December, is not helping copper’s cause, either.

Falling copper prices

As seen in the previous part of this series, copper prices have crashed to a fresh six-and-a-half-year low on concerns over the Chinese economy and a stronger US dollar. However, unlike other pure-play copper producers like Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ) and Southern Copper (SCCO), Freeport-McMoRan’s (FCX) worries extend beyond falling copper prices. Together, Freeport and Newmont Mining (NEM) form ~4.1% of the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB).

 

Lower energy prices

Freeport-McMoRan is also involved in the energy exploration business. In 3Q15, the company sold 1.0 billion pounds of copper, 23 million pounds of molybdenum, 13.8 MMBOE (or million barrels of oil equivalent), and 294,000 ounces of gold. Freeport has given a guidance of 13.3 MMBOE for 4Q15.

Energy exposure makes Freeport’s earnings sensitive to falling crude oil prices as well. The company’s energy operations generated an EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $0.3 billion in 3Q15. This is roughly one-third of Freeport’s 3Q15 consolidated EBITDA.

Sensitivity

According to Freeport-McMoRan, the company expects its 2016 EBITDA to fall by $215 million for every $5 per barrel fall in Brent oil prices. The company also expects its operating cash flows to be lower by $170 million for every $5 per barrel fall in Brent. Please note that the sensitivity is based only on the energy operations and does not account for diesel costs in Freeport’s copper operations.

Brent oil prices have fallen in the last couple of weeks, as can be seen in the graph above. Falling energy prices could weigh heavily on Freeport’s 4Q15 earnings.

Freeport noted that it is looking at “strategic alternatives” for its energy business. However, falling crude oil prices have only made things worse for Freeport’s plans.

Icahn lift

Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) jumped smartly in August after activist investor Carl Icahn disclosed his 8.5% stake in the company. Known as the “Icahn lift,” this phenomenon sometimes occurs after Icahn buys a stake in a company. The activist investor has a reputation for encouraging company management to make decisions that he perceives to be in the investors’ best interests.

part 3

Recent developments

The graph above shows some of the recent developments in Freeport-McMoRan after Icahn disclosed his stake. Currently, the activist investor holds two seats on Freeport’s board. In his statement following his representation on Freeport’s board, Icahn cited examples of companies like eBay (EBAY), Mentor Graphics (MENT), and Herbalife, whose “shareholder value has been greatly enhanced” after he won board representation.

Would it help?

To be fair, there’s not much that either Icahn or Freeport-McMoRan’s management can do when commodity prices are hovering at multiyear lows. For its part, the company has taken several aggressive measures, including mine closures and capital expenditure cuts. However, these can only help lessen the pain from falling commodity prices (COMT) (DBB).

Unfortunately for Freeport, even if it breaks off its energy assets, it would not be a smooth ride. Even Freeport’s core copper business is going through a rough patch on the back of a Chinese slowdown. To add to that, Freeport has a surging debt pile of $20.7 billion as of September 30, 2015. Freeport was looking to cut its debt next year. However, a continued slowdown in commodity prices could continue to pose challenges for Freeport’s optimistic 2016 plans.

Please read Freeport-McMoRan: Why the Current Rally Could be Unsustainable to learn more about the company’s outlook.

You can also visit Market Realist’s Copper page for the other recent developments in this industry.

Source: Freeport-McMoRan: A Roller Coaster Ride in November 2015 – Yahoo Finance