‘Our Way of Existence is Being Wiped Out’: B.C. First Nation Besieged by Industry | DeSmog Canada

Photo: Chief Marvin Yahey shows the new Ecotrust report at a news conference in Vancouver.

By Sarah Cox • Thursday, June 28, 2016

The B.C. government has significantly accelerated the rate and scale of industrial development in the Blueberry River First Nations’ traditional territory over the past four years despite knowledge of alarming impacts, says a major science report released today.

Our very life, our way of existence, is being wiped out,” Blueberry River Chief Marvin Yahey told a Vancouver press conference. “It’s devastating. It’s really impacted my people, culturally but socially also. It puts a lot of stress on a community.”

The report, authored by Ecotrust Canada and based on B.C. government data, found that up to 84 per cent of the Blueberry River traditional territory in B.C.’s northeast has been negatively impacted by industrial activity.

Almost 75 per cent of the territory now lies within 250 metres of an industrial disturbance, and more than 80 per cent is within 500 metres.

The industrial activity has really hammered our traditional territory,” Yahey said in an interview. “It affects our hunting, fishing, camping and teaching our children our way of life. The wildlife are vanishing. Our berry picking sites are being destroyed by pathways and pipelines.”

The 86-page study, commissioned by the Blueberry River First Nations and David Suzuki Foundation, is called the Atlas of Cumulative Landscape Disturbance in the Traditional Territory of Blueberry River First Nations.

It paints a bleak picture of the total impacts of all industrial development in the nation’s traditional territory, which covers more than 38,000 square kilometers in the Peace region.

Since 2012, the B.C. government has authorized the construction of more than 2,600 oil and gas wells, 1,884 kilometres of petroleum access and permanent roads, 740 kilometres of petroleum development roads, 1,500 kilometres of new pipelines and 9,400 kilometres of seismic lines, according to the report. Approximately 290 forestry cutblocks were also harvested in Blueberry River traditional territory over the same time period.

The disturbance atlas found that almost 70 per cent of Blueberry traditional territory is now covered by active petroleum and natural gas tenures. There are 4,676 abandoned oil and gas wells in the territory.

Several proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) lines could also extend into Blueberry River First Nations traditional territory, including Spectra Westcoast Connector, Coastal GasLink, North Montney Mainline and Prince Rupert Gas Transmission Project, the report said.

Blueberry River First Nations – Industrial Development Change Over Time

David Suzuki Foundation spokesperson Rachel Plotkin called the findings both an “ecological crisis and a crisis of social justice.”

In 1979, a sour gas leak forced Blueberry River members to flee from their original reserve on the banks of the Blueberry River, with only the clothes they were wearing.

Everything we left behind was destroyed,” recounted Yahey. “Animals, pets, food, clothing.”

The nation was eventually moved to its current location just two kilometres away, 80 kilometres northwest of Fort St. John.

The ‘Little Kuwait’ of Northern B.C.

Yahey said people refer to the current reserve as “Little Kuwait” because of the flares from fracking that light it up at night. Community members have purchased sour gas monitors to ensure they will have time to evacuate if there is another sour gas leak and they have to haul in safe drinking water due to a drop in water levels they believe is caused by nearby fracking operations.

We leave one area and go to another and it’s just as bad there today. We go to our hunting camps and [they’ve] been destroyed.”

The B.C. government ignored a September 2014 request from the Blueberry River First Nations for a cumulative impacts assessment and monitoring program that would guide decisions about land use and resource extraction, said Yahey.

There has been no meaningful response.”

On the contrary, the chief said the province continues to approve major industrial undertakings, including the expansion of fracking operations and the $8.8 billion Site C dam.

In an e-mailed statement, John Rustad, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation, said the B.C. government is aware of the Blueberry River First Nations’ concerns regarding resource development in their traditional territory.

Rustad said the government has developed a cumulative effects framework that is being applied in northeast B.C. to improve natural resource decision-making, along with a “regional strategic environmental assessment project.” Blueberry River First Nations has been invited to join these initiatives, Rustad said.

We also regulate all industries with rigorous environmental standards, and have programs in place to protect critical habitat for wildlife and water resources, and to ensure our air is clean,” said the minister’s statement.

Yahey said the government’s initiatives are not sufficient, and that there is “a hurry for B.C. to clear everything [and] wipe everything out without acknowledging our rights.”

In an effort to seek solutions, the Blueberry River First Nations used its own resources to develop a science-based Land Stewardship Framework. The framework, which Yahey calls a “path to yes”, identifies immediate action the provincial government can take to protect areas of importance to the Blueberry and to allow industrial development “without sacrificing ecological values.”

Critical Area Slated for Fracking

The Pink Mountain area, described by Chief Yahey as a “critical area” for Blueberry River First Nations traditional practices and an area the nation has been trying to protect, is one of many zones throughout Blueberry River territory that has been slated for shale gas drilling and fracking. Pink Mountain is currently the site of intense fracking operations by Progress Energy, a subsidiary of Malayasian-owned Petronas, one of the leading liquefied natural gas proponents in B.C.

Expansion of Pink Mountain fracking operations, leading to further landscape fragmentation, will occur if a proposed privately-built transmission line is built across Blueberry River territory to link the project with hydro facilities on the Peace River, including the Site C dam. In a controversial move, the B.C. government has excluded the proposed transmission line to Pink Mountain from independent review by the B.C. Utilities Commission.

Much of the development in the wildlife-rich Pink Mountain area is occurring in a region that, until very recently, had not been subject to the intense industrial development that characterizes the landscape further to the south in Blueberry River traditional territory.

The territory overlays the Montney basin, which contains the largest shale gas reserves in the province and some of the largest in the world. While much of the gas industry currently battles low prices, the Montney’s gas resources contains a high content of valuable liquids that allow companies to continue to extract the gas profitably.

The Blueberry River First Nations are not opposed to development but want to be included in plans, said Yahey. To that end, the chief described a lawsuit the nation launched against the province of B.C. in March 2015 as a “last hope.”

The ongoing lawsuit claims that the cumulative impacts from extensive industrial development, including Site C, violate Treaty 8, which the Blueberry River First Nations signed in 1900.

The claim asserts that Blueberry River members can no longer access uncontaminated land and resources capable of sustaining traditional patterns of economic activity and land use, as guaranteed by the treaty. These include hunting, eating moose, harvesting berries and medicinal plants and teaching children their language while on the land.

Our backs are against the wall,” said Yahey. “We’ve tried all the time to come up with a solution. This was our only way to get them to the table to protect our way of life.”

The disturbance atlas also demonstrates that the Peace region has received a disproportionate share of the province’s industrial activity and lacks protected areas compared to other regions of B.C.

Less than one per cent of Blueberry River First Nations traditional territory is conserved in parks and protected areas, compared to 14 per cent province-wide.

While 60 per cent of B.C. is classified as intact forest landscape, less than 14 per cent remains in Blueberry territory. And almost one-half of the total area in B.C. reserved for pipelines through tenures falls in the Blueberry River traditional territory.

Source: ‘Our Way of Existence is Being Wiped Out’: B.C. First Nation Besieged by Industry | DeSmog Canada

Varcoe: Alberta seeks answers on links between earthquakes and fracking

Jeff Gu, a University of Alberta geophysicist, says the scientific community needs to better understand what’s triggering earthquakes near fracking operations. Ryan Jackson / Ryan Jackson/Edmonton Journal

 

Early in the new year, a tremor shook the area near Fox Creek in northwest Alberta.

It wasn’t the region’s first earthquake, but it was the largest — rattling pictures on walls, but not causing injuries or damage.

However, it did more than simply unnerve local residents.

It reverberated into the Alberta government, which ordered the province’s energy regulator to speed up its examination into the links between hydraulic fracturing and seismic activity.

The tremor that struck just west of Fox Creek on Jan. 12 registered as a 4.8-magnitude event, classified as a moderate quake.

Three months later — and after 23 more seismic events in the area — the province has just received a draft report on the issue from the Alberta Energy Regulator, with a final version expected this fall.

No one is saying what’s in the preliminary version.

But it’s logical to expect the AER will recommend more education, and possibly more monitoring, as more fracking by energy companies takes place.

Hopefully, it will call for more science to understand why this particular area has felt so many tremors, with more than 420 seismic events recorded near Fox Creek since the start of 2015.

The review comes as a new survey published this week by a team of researchers indicates a link between oilpatch hydraulic fracturing in Western Canada and quakes in the region.

The group reviewed data from 12,289 oil and gas wells drilled across the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) since 1985.

In 39 cases, it found a correlation with earthquakes that registered at a magnitude of 3 or more.

Between 2010 and 2015, more than half of all induced earthquakes of such scale occurred “in close proximity to hydraulic fracturing operations, in both time and space.”

“There’s a scientific consensus that some areas — particularly in the Fox Creek area and parts of the Montney trend of British Columbia — there’s a clear association between hydraulic fracturing and induced earthquakes,” says David Eaton, a geophysicist at the University of Calgary who worked on the report.

Before the fault-line of public opinion splits apart in Alberta, it’s important to put this issue into context.

According to the Alberta Geological Survey, any seismic event of a magnitude under 4 is categorized as being “small, minor or micro,” while under 6 is deemed “moderate.”

Provincial data indicates only four earthquakes near Fox Creek since 2015 have been categorized at a magnitude of 4 or higher.

The industry drills thousands of wells each year. Last year, the AER approved almost 2,000 wells completed by fracturing.

Yet, the study found significant seismic activity occurred in only a tiny fraction of fractured wells, about 0.3 per cent of such cases.

 The AER points out induced seismic activity has not caused any injuries or damage. But that doesn’t mean we should ignore the issue, either.

“Considering that thousands of such wells are drilled every year in the WCSB, the implications for hazard are nonetheless significant … particularly if multiple operations are located in close proximity to critical infrastructure,” the report cautions.

In other words, Alberta only needs one significant man-made seismic headache for the fallout to shake everyone to their core.

Jeff Gu, a University of Alberta geophysicist involved in the study, notes the report uncovers several other findings.

Unlike induced earthquakes in United States, which appear to be tied to underground wastewater disposal, the main source of induced earthquakes in Canada is associated with hydraulic fracturing.

But he believes the scientific community needs to better understand what’s triggering these quakes, why they’re clustered in specific areas — such as the Duvernay formation around Fox Creek — and how the risk can be reduced.

“It’s definitely worth looking into because we don’t know exactly how big these events are or can be, and where the next one will happen,” Gu says.

Canada trails only the United States in developing its shale oil and gas resources, and fracking has allowed the industry to unlock massive petroleum reserves underground.

The method usually involves high-pressure injection of fluids along horizontally drilled wells, often at two or three kilometres deep, to create or open cracks in rock underground to access the resource.

The NDP government took a cautious stance to the new survey this week, saying it’s working with the regulator and industry to better understand the relationship between fracking and seismic activity.

From industry’s perspective, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers noted the report reinforces a link between hydraulic fracturing and seismicity established in recent studies in British Columbia — but it also shows the vast majority of seismic events in the basin are minor and localized.

In the regulator’s realm, the AER issued new rules for operators near Fox Creek following an earlier quake in 2015. It requires companies fracking in the area to monitor seismic activity within five kilometres of their wells.

The AER also introduced a traffic light system: if companies record anything above a magnitude 2 event while fracking, they hit a yellow light and must inform the regulator. Anything above a 4-magnitude quake means full stop.

This go-slow approach makes sense. A moratorium, such as in New Brunswick, doesn’t seem like the answer.

And hopefully, the AER examination will get to the bottom of what’s causing the tremors near Fox Creek.

“We have to weigh the economic development against the risks on both sides. There’s a danger in going too far in either direction,” says Eaton.

In other words, proceed with caution.

Chris Varcoe is a Calgary Herald columnist

cvarcoe@calgaryherald.com

Source: Varcoe: Alberta seeks answers on links between earthquakes and fracking | Calgary Herald

ACTION ALERT: Protect B.C.’s water from corporate freeloaders

https://i0.wp.com/psacbc.com/sites/bc.psacadmin.ca/files/imagecache/psac_site_logo/sites/bc.psacadmin.ca/themes/descartes/images/psac_afpc_logo.gif

Please take a moment to sign and share this important petition!

Imagine a place where companies can take as much water as they want. They don’t need to ask permission from government or the community. And they don’t have to pay any fees for the water they use. Sound unbelievable?

Well, it’s not – at least not in British Columbia.

B.C. doesn’t require companies to apply for permits when they withdraw groundwater, nor to report how much water they are taking. This allows industries, such as bottled water and fracking, to use groundwater at no cost.

Nestlé alone withdraws 265 million litres of groundwater a year from Hope, B.C.

Tell the B.C. government that enough is enough. You want action now! Sign the petition here.