BC Government Leaving School Districts In No Win Situation

 

Just-saying

April 23, 201 4

By Andrew Chernoff     https://andrewchernoff.wordpress.com                                   

It should be clear by now. Talk is cheap.

The BC government is not open for business. The doors are closed and their ears are plugged.

The headlines say it all:

From angry teachers, to fuming Cupe education workers, boisterous parents, and frustrated school trustees, it is clear it is not working.

Can civil disobedience be far off the horizon? Just saying….

Or are all these headlines just full of talk, emotion, frustration with no real substance or desire to make real change….to make a real difference…to actually act and put it all on the line, in the streets, on the provincial legislature?

HELLO???!!!!!

For what should be a galvanizing issue….it sure is lonely out here all alone….just saying.

Public sector wage bonus tied to B.C. economic growth puzzles experts

Proposed five-year contract has 5.5-per-cent increase guaranteed

By Gordon Hoekstra, Vancouver Sun December 4, 2013

A tentative five-year deal struck by the B.C. Liberal government with some public-sector unions that would tie additional wage increases to improvements in the economy is unusual, say labour experts.

In the private sector, prospective wage or income increases would normally be tied to workers’ efforts.

But there’s little government workers could do to improve the larger provincial economy, noted Ken Thornicroft, a professor of law and labour relations at the University of Victoria.

“The thing that differentiates this thing in my mind from private sector arrangements of the same ilk is that often in the private sector it’s a profit sharing arrangement, whereby the employees have a more direct linkage between the firm’s performance and their own efforts,” observed Thornicroft.

“Whereas here you are talking about the macro economy, and it’s hard for me to see how public sector employees could do much if anything to influence GDP,” he said.

GDP, or gross domestic product, is the value of all goods and services produced in an economy.

Simon Fraser University professor Mark Thompson said essentially the deal provides a productivity bonus, but what is interesting is it depends on the productivity of everybody else.

“It’s not like people can say we are going to process twice as many welfare recipient claims in an hour. It sounds like the kind of thing that a government desperate to hammer out a deal might throw in to soften it,” said Thompson.

So far, three tentative five-year deals cover 51,000 workers in government, social services, environment, community living and aboriginal services. The workers are represented by a number of unions including the B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, the Hospital Employees’ Union, and the Health Sciences Association.

The government has yet to negotiate deals with teachers or nurses.

The three tentative agreements, which would expire in March 2019, includes wage increases amounting to about 5.5 per cent.

The agreement also provide the possibility of increased payments to workers if the province’s real gross domestic product exceeds the forecast by the independent Economic Forecast Council published each year in February. That will be determined using Statistic Canada data that will be compared against the forecast.

If the real GDP growth is one per cent above the forecast, then workers would receive a 0.5 per cent wage increase above the already-negotiated increase. Therefore, a worker earning $50,000 a year would receive an extra $250 if the economy outperformed the forecast by one per cent.

As the B.C. government would expect to increase revenues by at least $200 million a year for a one per cent growth in GDP, it would be able to fund the wage increase.

“There is a dimension to this that is new and novel, and one that I’d be kidding if I didn’t say I’m intensely interested and excited about,” said Finance Minister Mike de Jong. “Under this mechanism, public sector workers will share in the benefits that flow from that additional (economic) growth. We think that’s appropriate.”

A similar deal was struck in Quebec in 2010, although it was tied to nominal GDP growth, which is not adjusted for inflation. The five-year deal provided guaranteed wage increases of seven per cent, which could increase another 3.5 per cent if Quebec’s economy grew faster than government estimates used to achieve a balanced budget.

BCGEU president Darryl Walker said he didn’t necessarily disagree that public sector workers do not have a big impact on the province’s economic growth, but noted there are revenues that are produced in the work they do.

Crown agencies such as B.C. Timber Sales generate revenues for the province, which are indirectly accounted for in GDP.

Walker said the union was aware of the Quebec situation, but didn’t instantly jump at the idea. When they discovered an analysis of the past dozen years showed workers could have received an additional raise of 1.5 per cent, they decided to look at it, noted Walker.

“We thought it was worth agreeing to,” he said, noting they are already guaranteed the 5.5 per cent increase.

Thornicroft believes the unusual deal, ultimately, is a way for the B.C. government to get a longer deal than unions may have been willing to agree to because now workers will benefit if the economy improves more than forecast.

Normally, you’d expect unions to sign a three-year deal, he said.

The B.C. Liberal government under Premier Christy Clark has floated the idea of a 10-year contract with teachers.

Thornicroft believes that unionized workers will vote in favour of the five-year agreement.

Thompson said while not a lot of money is at stake in the portion of the agreement tied to economic growth, workers might be concerned that the unusual deal will set a precedent where future raises are tied to economy’s performance.

In some way, they’ve increased the risk on their paycheque, he said.

With file from Canadian Pressghoekstra@vancouversun.com

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Vaughn Palmer: ‘Growth-sharing’ model eyed for public sector union deals

Finance minister’s plan would directly tie public sector compensation to provincial economic growth

By Vaughn Palmer, Vancouver Sun columnist November 27, 2013

Vaughn Palmer: ‘Growth-sharing’ model eyed for public sector union deals   Finance Minister Mike de Jong says the provincial government wants to ‘share the benefits of (economic) growth with the people that helped us get there.’Photograph by: Adrian Wyld , THE CANADIAN PRESS

VICTORIA — Finance Minister Mike de Jong was winding up a status report on a provincial budget that remains balanced on the edge of a razor Wednesday when he got to the news about the government’s mandate for the next round of public sector wage negotiations.

Gone are “net zero” and “cooperative gainsharing,” themes of the last two rounds. Enter “economic growth-sharing,” the government’s watchword for bargaining on contracts that expire next March 31.

The Liberals, taking their lead from expectations of modest growth in the years ahead, will offer correspondingly modest increases in wages and benefits to public sector workers. Wanting long-term stability as well, they are seeking settlements in the range of five per cent over five years.

But if the economy outperforms expectations, the government is prepared to translate the resulting revenue windfall into additional raises for public sector workers.

“I’m trying to be candid about the limited means at our disposal for locked-in general wage increases, “ de Jong told reporters. “This is a mechanism by which if collectively we can do better, the government is saying we want to share the benefits of that growth with the people that helped get us there.”

The starting point for de Jong’s proposed “mechanism” would be the annual growth projection from the independent forecasting council. The council is a defined-in-law panel of economists and other experts that meets every December to set the parameters for the following year’s provincial budget.

The finishing point would be the actual rate of growth, as determined after the fact by Statistics Canada in its annual calculations of “real gross domestic product at market prices” for the country’s provinces and territories. Real GDP growth, in shorthand.

In the event the latter performance exceeds the former projection, the government is proposing to split the difference in terms of an additional wage increase for public sector workers. A rate of growth that exceeded the forecast by one percentage point, would translate into a half-point wage increase.

One public sector union, the Health Sciences Association, has already tentatively accepted the formula, albeit subject to ratification. The union’s 17,000 members, including technologists, pharmacists, radiologists, dietitians, therapists and other health care professionals, are voting this month and into the next on a deal reached Nov. 8.

If ratified, it would provide them with a basic increase of 5.5 per cent spread over five years, plus what are called “economic stability dividends” if the economy outperforms expectations in the final four years of the agreement.

As a hypothetical example, derived from the union’s briefing for its members, suppose that in December 2014 the members of the economic forecasting council project the rate of economic growth for the year ahead at 2.1 per cent, on average. The number is duly recorded and published in the provincial budget presented to the legislature in February 2015.

Then in November 2016 Statistics Canada weighs in, right on schedule, with its calculation of how much the economy actually grew in the preceding year: 3.1 per cent.

Out come the calculators and out goes a directive from the Ministry of Finance to employers in the health care sector to begin paying out an additional half a percentage point to HSA members starting in 2017.

What if the economy went in the opposite direction and underperformed the forecast? There’d be no wage cut. The Liberals want public sector workers to go along with this experiment, not run for cover from it.

If approved, the HSA deal would be the first of its kind, here or in most other Canadian jurisdictions. Also a significant step toward the Liberal goal of tying public sector compensation to overall performance of the economy. Perhaps it might dispose public sector unions and their members to be more supportive of measures to encourage resource development, investment and private sector growth.

“It’s about the partnership,” de Jong explained. “The government is in partnership with the private sector in terms of generating that economic growth and the public sector is part of that partnership, a big part.

“They are a key part of the equation and a key mechanism by which we work with the private sector to create the circumstances in which the investment occurs and the economy grows. This is a means by which we can formalize that partnership and share some of the benefits.”

Nor is the prospect purely hypothetical. The finance ministry has produced a chart showing that if the growth-sharing mechanism were in place for all public sector workers since the Liberals took office, the cumulative result would have been an additional three-per-cent increase in wages over the 12 years and a payout from the provincial treasury of almost half a billion dollars.

Still, as de Jong noted, the HSA deal is but a first step and a tentative one at that. “I’m going to be careful about prejudging the outcome of discussions,” he told reporters, not disguising that he and his colleagues hope that growth-sharing becomes the standard for this round of public sector bargaining.

A one-per-cent increase in provincial economic growth translates into an estimated $200 million to $350 million in extra government revenues. A one-per-cent wage hike for all unionized public sector workers equates to about $200 million.

B.C. NDP’s new president faces ‘daunting’ task

Rob Shaw / Times Colonist
November 23, 2013 10:29 PM

Craig Keating.jpg

Newly appointed President of the BC NDP party Craig Keating addresses a crowd at the British Columbia NDP Convention in Vancouver, B.C. Sunday, Nov.17, 2013.  Photograph by: JONATHAN HAYWARD, The Canadian Press

The B.C. NDP’s new president admits he’s facing a daunting task in regrouping his party after a devastating loss in the May provincial election.

Craig Keating, a North Vancouver councillor who was elected president at the party’s convention last weekend, said he’s got a clear mandate from New Democrats to modernize party organization and reach out to ridings where the NDP didn’t win to help craft a strategy for success in 2017.

“I’d be lying if I didn’t think it was daunting,” Keating said in an interview. “It’s not because the party is in disorder. There’s no doubt about it, we lost the election and we have debt to deal with, but there’s lots of positives. We have identified tons of supporters, we identified lots of volunteers … but nonetheless, the project here is: How do we win? And that’s my focus.”

Keating took over the presidency from Moe Sihota, the former NDP cabinet minister and Victoria-area MLA.

One of Keating’s first challenges will be to set up the leadership race to replace Adrian Dix, who announced his intention to resign after the NDP blew a perceived lead in the election and lost to Christy Clark’s B.C. Liberals.

The NDP’s provincial council has set the vote for fall 2014, and Keating said the NDP needs to find a facility, set entry fees and finalize race rules. “People aren’t going to get into the race until they know what the rules are,” he said.

The NDP still has $1.7 million in debt left from its election campaign, and Keating said he will need to creatively tackle fundraising to retire the loans and begin building a new war chest.

The party also needs to modernize the computer system it uses to contact voters, and keep organizers active in ridings where it lacks MLAs but thinks it can win, he said. The NDP must “build up a stock of goodwill” among volunteers and party members who have expressed unhappiness at how their involvement has been reduced to cutting donation cheques, he said.

“We need to start getting in touch with some people in communities across this province where we’re not elected, and start talking about what their realities are and how do we get a vision that’s going to get people out of their seats and voting for us in the next election,” he said.

There’s also the matter of messy internal grudges.

Documents at the NDP convention revealed the party still has four outstanding formal complaints against MLAs who helped overthrow former leader Carole James. An oversight committee recommended Keating deal with the situation quickly.

However, Keating said he has other priorities. “The file, in a literal sense, has not been handed to me,” he said. “It’s not on my immediate radar screen.”

There’s also a push to take a recent report into how the NDP blew the election and turn it into some sort of concrete action, Keating said.

“I encourage people to continue to reflect on what went wrong, but in the way of constructive criticism of what we do next,” he said.

rshaw@timescolonist.com

© Copyright 2013

BCGEU calls on government to invest in public services and identifies new revenue sources

The BCGEU/NUPGE submission calls for an investment in public services and provides ideas for new and increased sources of government revenue.

    

Vancouver (26 Sept. 2013) – Darryl Walker, President of the B.C. Government and Service Employees Union (BCGEU/NUPGE) presented a submission to the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services in Port Coquitlam on September 24.

The submission calls for an investment in public services and provides ideas for new and increased sources of government revenue.

It also “challenges the government to take steps to support workers, families and communities, and to revitalize our province’s economy by making targeted investments in green infrastructure projects to prompt real and sustainable job creation and economic growth, and by investing in key public services that will assist British Columbians recovering from prolonged economic hardship.”

You can read the full submission here.