Oil lurches closer to $20 Goldman Sachs doomsday forecast: ‘The supports are crumbling’

LONDON — When U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs said last year that oil could fall as low as US$20 per barrel, it assigned a fairly low probability to that scenario.

A deepening oil market slump is adding fresh pain for producers of the world’s cheapest crude as the Canadian heavy grade reached a record low, raising the prospect of more production coming offline.

Fast-forward five months and in some parts of the world the forecast has already proved correct. Canadian physical crude has been selling this week at below US$20 per barrel, less than it costs to extract and transport. Traders in the options market, meanwhile, are taking protection against prices falling below US$25.

The developments reflect growing concerns that a market already awash in too much oil is now suffering the double-whammy of a sharp slowdown in U.S. and Chinese demand.

For the past 18 months, oversupply has been the main factor responsible for dragging down prices by two-thirds, after Saudi Arabia pushed OPEC to ramp up exports to fight for market share with higher-cost producers such as U.S. shale firms.

Low prices spurred global demand to multi-year highs, saving oil from a further collapse and encouraging producers to hope that the market might recover later in 2016.

But just as Saudi Arabia was about to start celebrating its first tactical victories, with U.S. output declining under pressure from low prices, signs are emerging that demand in the United States, China and Europe is much weaker than anticipated.

Estimated demand from China, the world’s second largest consumer and the engine of global economic growth since the commodities boom started in the early 2000s, fell in both September and November, compared to the same months of 2014.

U.S. demand, the world’s largest, began falling from October, according to the latest available data, despite low gasoline prices, while U.S. distillate demand slid to its lowest for more than a decade towards the end of 2015.

Demand in the European Union turned flat in October, having surprised on the upside throughout most of the year.

“2015 started off with a spectacular growth in demand. But in the last quarter of 2015, things seem to have changed,” said Abhishek Deshpande, an analyst at banking and investment group Natixis.

“SUPPORTS CRUMBLING”

Goldman’s drastic scenario was based on the logic that the market might have to undergo a US$20 per barrel price shock in order to force an acceleration in the shutdown of unprofitable production.

That no longer seems fanciful.

“Oil has been under pressure as of late, and downside risks of a dip into the US$20s have grown,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch said on Thursday.

The same day, Brent and WTI futures fell briefly to their lowest levels since 2004, near US$32 per barrel, as a sliding yuan and an emergency halt in Chinese stock market trading left Asian markets in turmoil.

Oil has been under pressure as of late, and downside risks of a dip into the US$20s have grown

For oil prices to fall as much as 5 per cent in early and usually calm Asian trading hours is very rare, and even veteran chart-watchers are now struggling to draw a line under the biggest rout in decades.

“The supports are crumbling… There is not a winning long in the market – maximum pain is lower. It is not advised to be long,” said Robin Bieber of brokers PVM.

He said there would not be much to stop oil falling into the mid-US$20s if WTI crude fell below the US$32.40 a barrel support level. Minutes later, WTI fell as low as US$32.10, although prices slightly recovered towards US$34 per barrel later in the day.

NEGATIVE OIL

Over the past year, the world has been producing 1.5 million bpd more oil than it consumes. OPEC and the International Energy Agency expect global demand growth to slow in 2016 to around 1.20-1.25 million barrels per day from a very high 1.8 million bpd in 2015.

That means that for most of 2016 the world will still be producing more than it can consume, adding to record stockpiles already exceeding 3 billion barrels.

The options market is showing that fears are indeed on the rise that futures could fall further. The Chicago Board Options Exchange’s oil volatility index has risen 20 per cent so far this year.

Implied volatility in ICE Brent options – including the US$30/barrel and US$25/barrel Feb 16 option – has spiked in recent weeks. Some investors are protecting themselves by acquiring put options giving them the right to sell at US$25, anticipating that Brent will fall below that.

“There has been more interest in buying options like US$25 puts and open interest has increased. Volatility has been rallying. The action that we have seen shows that people have a bearish slant,” said a senior options trader at a major bank.

But while the futures market is only preparing for a dip below US$30 per barrel, prices in the physical markets – where oil producers sell and refiners buy actual barrels – have already fallen much further.

The price of an OPEC basket of 13 crude grades fell to US$29.71 a barrel on Wednesday, according to calculations from the cartel.

Most shocking was the outright price of Canadian heavy crude, which dropped below UA$20 a barrel.

Northern Alberta’s vast oilsands hold the world’s third-largest crude reserves but carry some of the highest production costs globally — up to US$50 a barrel — because of the energy-intensive production process.

Most Canadian and U.S. companies will likely keep producing to pay bills and loans, even if the crude price does not cover cash operating costs such as extraction, blending and transportation.

“There is a high risk a lot of these companies could fold, but really speaking we are looking at more consolidation and potential restructuring,” Natixis analyst Deshpande said.

© Thomson Reuters 2016

Source: Oil lurches closer to $20 Goldman Sachs doomsday forecast: ‘The supports are crumbling’ | Financial Post

Oil down again; glut forces biggest weekly loss in eight months

Oil slumped again on Friday, extending the week’s loss to the largest in eight months, as swelling storage of crude on both land and sea pressured prices.

Brent, the global benchmark for oil, settled down 1 percent and less than $2 from a new 6-1/2-year low.

U.S. crude fell 2 percent, barely holding above $40 a barrel.

Both benchmarks lost 8 percent on the week, the most since mid-March.

Oil prices have fallen in seven of the last eight sessions, with losses accelerating after U.S. government data on Thursday affirmed a seventh weekly rise in U.S. crude inventories that took stockpiles near April’s record highs.

Adding more pressure to prices, data on Friday showed the first rise in the U.S. oil rig count in 11 weeks.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) said there was a record 3 billion barrels of crude and oil products in tanks worldwide.

“The evolving bearish global balances that we alluded to all year are acquiring increased transparency,” said Jim Ritterbusch of Chicago-based oil consultancy Ritterbusch & Associates.

Brent settled down 45 cents at $43.61 a barrel, as the December contract which served as the front-month expired. It lost nearly $4 on the week.

U.S. crude finished down $1.01 at $40.74, losing $3.65 on the week.

The slump extended to oil products as well, with U.S. gasoline futures closing near 10-month lows.

While the downturn was triggered by weak fundamentals across the petroleum complex, oil was also caught in a broader commodities selloff. The Thomson Reuters/Core Commodity CRB Index, a global gauge for the asset class, was near its lowest since 2002.

An estimated oversupply of 0.7 million to 2.5 million barrels per day has pushed crude prices down by almost two-thirds since June 2014.

Tens of millions of barrels are sitting on tankers at sea, looking for buyers.

The IEA said a mild winter could further swell the global glut.

The premium for storing U.S. crude for one year over crude for delivery in December hit record highs on Friday as traders deferred shipments in the hope of getting higher prices later.

The entire strip of futures prices for the next six months has also weakened over the past four weeks. [KEMP/]

Options trading has, meanwhile, spiked with a soaring number of options taken to sell crude if prices fall to $40 or even $25.

(Additional reporting by Libby George in London and Henning Gloystein in Singapore; Editing by David Gregorio Editing by Nick Zieminski)

 

Source: Oil down again; glut forces biggest weekly loss in eight months | Reuters

Unsold oil stuck on tankers threatens world market gridlock

LONDON – As land storage sites worldwide reach brimming point due to a supply glut, tens of millions of barrels of oil are sitting on tankers looking for homes – threatening logistical paralysis.

The International Energy Agency on Friday said stored oil has hit 3 billion barrels. Traders say the excess of crude is leaving tankers queuing at major ports worldwide, lengthening waiting times to days, weeks and even months.

The lack of space to unload oil is tying up the tankers needed to keep oil moving, and wells running. The bottlenecks could force oil suppliers into quick, cut-priced sales just to free space, adding more pressure to oil prices already close to six-year lows.

The cost to hire a supertanker – each capable of carrying 2 million barrels of oil – recently hit its highest level since 2008 at over $100,000 a day last month and currently remains at over $70,000 a day.

“We’re alarmed,” said Eugene Lindell, senior crude market analyst with JBC Energy. “There are growing indicators that it’s getting harder to digest this crude.”

In related news, Oil tankers queueing in U.S. Gulf seen as new symbol of glut.

FROM TEXAS TO CHINA

In the U.S. Gulf, more than 50 commercial vessels were anchored outside ports near Houston at the end of last week, of which 41 were tankers.

Trade sources said there were seven aframax tankers – each capable of carrying up to 700,000 barrels of oil – sitting outside Rotterdam waiting to unload. There was also nearly 15 million barrels of unsold West African crude oil either loaded on tankers or waiting to be loaded in the next two weeks.

Shipping and port sources, pointing to full onshore storage, said up to 20 supertankers were held up in Iraq’s Basrah terminal, with vessels experiencing loading delays of up to 12 days.

One port source said at China’s Qingdao port, one supertanker was stuck at anchorage since August and another since last month.

“There are delays across the board as a lot of cargo is being put through the system. Port delays in Basrah and China in particular but also in many other areas. This is tying up capacity,” said one tanker source.

Shipping consultants MSI said the near-term outlook for crude tankers was positive.

“Storage space in China and Europe is dwindling, leading to extended discharge times. Couple this with ongoing high load waiting times in Iraq and Turkish Straits delays and (tanker) availability is tight,” MSI said.

A problem for oil players is that tankers have not been booked on long-term charters. This is in contrast to the floating storage play seen earlier this year, when ships were parked at sea until prices recovered and were then sold by oil traders for a profit.

Sources said the current build up was parked on vessels hired for shorter journeys, meaning oil suppliers will have to unload soon or face more freight expenses.

“Those holding stocks will either have to dump their cargoes at cheaper prices or pay those higher freight costs,” a trade source said.

Another added: “Each minute the clock is ticking, they’re losing money.”

(Additional reporting by Amanda Cooper, editing by William Hardy)

Source: Unsold oil stuck on tankers threatens world market gridlock | marcellus.com

Lost in Transition: How the energy sector is missing potential demand destruction | Carbon Tracker Initiative

Rapid advances in technology, increasingly cheap renewable energy, slower economic growth and lower than expected population rise could all dampen fossil fuel demand significantly by 2040, a new study published today by the London-based Carbon Tracker Initiative finds.

The analysis challenges nine business as usual (BAU) assumptions made by the big energy companies when calculating that fossil use will continue to grow for the next few decades. Typical industry scenarios see coal, oil and gas use growing by 30%-50% and still making up 75% of the energy supply mix in 2040. These scenarios do not reflect the huge potential for reducing fossil fuel demand in accordance with decarbonisation pathways.

The in-depth analysis exposes that fossil fuel industry thinking is skewed to the upside, and relies too heavily on high demand assumptions to justify new and costly capital investments to shareholders. Reviewing previous industry, IEA and U.S. EIA projections, shows them to be too conservative in their expectations for renewables growth. This raises questions over the likely accuracy of their future projections.

Carbon Tracker’s head of research, James Leaton, said:

“We have seen in recent weeks how the fossil fuel sector has misled consumers and investors about emissions — the Volkswagen scandal being a case in point — and deliberately acted against climate science for decades, judging from the recent Exxon expose. Why should investors accept their claims about future coal and oil demand when they clearly don’t stack up with technology and policy developments?

“Investors need to challenge companies who are ignoring the demand destruction that the market sees coming through much sooner than the business as usual scenarios being cited by the industry. Otherwise they will be on the wrong side of the energy revolution.”

Source: Lost in Transition: How the energy sector is missing potential demand destruction | Carbon Tracker Initiative

What The Oil And Gas Industry Is Not Telling Investors | OilPrice.com

Oil prices crashed because of too much supply, but will rebound as production shrinks and demand rises. But what if long-term demand for oil ends up being sharply lower than what the oil industry believes?

That is the subject of a new report from The Carbon Tracker Initiative, which looks at a range of scenarios that could blow up oil industry projections for long-term oil demand.

Source: What The Oil And Gas Industry Is Not Telling Investors | OilPrice.com