CETA: Provinces Failing To Defend Themselves In Canada-EU Free Trade Negotiations, Says Lawyer

07/10/2012   http://www.huffingtonpost.ca  

Althia Raj  Althia Raj

 

Ceta Canada Eu Free Trade

Civil Society Critics of CETA, the Canada-EU free trade deal, deliver a Trojan horse to Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, October 17, 2011. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick)

OTTAWA — Canadian provinces are either ill-equipped or incompetent when it comes to defending their rights in a massive and overarching free trade agreement Canada is currently negotiating with the European Union, says a lawyer who has studied leaked drafts of the text.

“The provinces are selling us out and they are not doing their homework,” Steven Shrybman, an international trade and public interest lawyer, told The Huffington Post Canada.

The federal government, along with provincial and territorial representatives, is finishing up negotiations on CETA, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, which it hopes to sign with the EU by the end of the year. The deal, the government says, will boost bilateral trade and inject $12-billion annually into the Canadian economy.

But critics decry what they’ve seen of the deal, which applies to sub-national governments for the first time, saying it will give European corporations the ability to compete for local contracts on everything from school buses to municipal water systems.

They are also concerned foreign companies will be able to challenge municipal or provincial regulations that favour local jobs or regional development.

Though Ottawa will sign off on the final agreement, for the first time provincial negotiators are at the table. Municipalities, as creatures of the provinces, are represented by provincial negotiators.

In a legal brief prepared for CUPE, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Shrybman studied the list of items Canada sought to exempt from international competition. He found that while the European Union had asked for blanket exemptions to protect many public utilities in various sectors, most provinces and the territories have not done the same.

“There is a dramatic disparity between what the Europeans have put on the table and what we have put on the table,” Shrybman said. “They are preserving their ability to govern in the public interest in far more ways then we have.”

Paul Moist, CUPE’s national president, said the union was sharing the legal brief as a “wake-up” call for premiers.

“Why are European member countries seeking exemptions for their water and their public transit systems and we are not, are there not red flags being raised by the conduct of the Europeans?” he asked.

Moist, whose members work in many sectors covered under CETA — such as school boards, the health care system, municipalities and social services agencies — said the free trade agreements negotiated in the 1980s and 1990s exempted most of those services.

“The opposite is happening here, so CETA represents pretty uncharted territory for Canada,” Moist said. “If you don’t exempt something, it is included.”

Under NAFTA rules, any rights granted to European corporations under CETA would also automatically apply to North American companies.

Canada’s initial offers, leaked earlier this year and circulated by the Trade Justice Network and Reseau quebecois sur l’integration continentale (RQIC), show wide variations between the provinces. Manitoba, for example, wants to limit market access to foreign providers and investors in fishing, forestry, food, liquor, beer and wine retail trade, agriculture, energy, recreational services and insurance. Other provinces, including Ontario, Quebec and B.C., sought few or no restrictions.

Some provinces may be doing a poor job of defending their interests simply because they don’t fully understand the effects the deal could have, Shrybman said.

“There is general illiteracy in the political leadership of provincial governments. They’ve never confronted anything like this before. Free trade is kind of old news to them and the fact that the dramatic transformation of how these agreements would apply to sub-national governments I don’t think has been properly conveyed,” he said.

Shrybman believes some provinces have not sought exemptions because they are led by parties that believe in smaller government and more privatization.

Without negotiated exemptions, the provinces and territories will be permanently bound by the agreement. Future governments won’t be able to establish new policies or public services without paying out millions — or possibly hundreds of millions of dollars — in compensation to foreign companies who challenge them, Shrybman said.

MUNICIPALITIES’ CONCERNS

Concerns about the trade deal prompted dozens of Canadian municipalities to pass resolutions asking their respective provinces to exclude them from CETA, including: Toronto, Victoria, London, Ont., and Sackville, New Brunswick.

In Baie-Comeau, Que., a township on the northern coast of the Saint Lawrence River, Councillor Alain Larouche brought forward a motion to try to exclude his municipality from CETA because he wanted to ensure local companies could be favoured in government contracting.

“International competition could jeopardize our local businesses and companies, so we sought a form of protectionism,” Larouche told HuffPost.

“We’re in the regions and our industries are more fragile, they are a lot less competitive than international firms. It’s obvious for us that our companies are a generator of jobs and that’s why we want to protect our jobs,” he said in a phone interview.

Those concerns were echoed by Bill Holmes, a former councillor in the Ontario township of Alnwick/Haldimand. Holmes, who recently stepped down due to a cancer diagnosis, said he wanted his municipality excluded from CETA because he was concerned it would affect the council’s ability to establish ‘buy-local’ policies and create good full-time jobs with benefits for the town.

In New Tecumseh, Ont., Councillor Jim Stone fears a loss of control with new international players.

“What are the benefits and what are the costs? We have never received that equation,” he told HuffPost.

For example, if the town wants to bid on water or sewage systems, “we would have to include the European community to bid on these things and you would lose total control over environmental aspects (and) the things that you would like to see local,” he said. “It puts our workers in jeopardy.”

Government and business leaders say CETA’s $340,000 procurement threshold — the minimum cost at which international firms are allowed to bid — in the goods-and-services sector and $8.5 million for construction projects is higher than what is already in place through the Agreement on Internal Trade. But for Stone, that’s still too low.

“You don’t get much for $300,000 in a municipal service today,” he said.

CETA will give corporations further powers to influence Canadian laws, Stone told HuffPost.

“(They’ll say) you can’t pass a law that benefits your own people because we are not going to do it over here. You know, that’s what happens so the whole bar gets lowered. We are trying to raise our bar and they come and knock it off the peg and say you start back down here,” the New Tecumseh Councillor said.

City Councillor Sav Dhaliwal of Burnaby, B.C., said that while he is a staunch supporter of free trade, local politicians want to know what they are being forced to sign on to. Burnaby has led an effort for several years to exempt all municipalities from CETA.

“We have never found out clearly, or at least to a point, what is on the table, what is being exempted, so that is a part of the frustration for us,” Dhaliwal said.

THE PROVINCES RESPOND

Andy Watson, a public affairs officer with the British Columbia Ministry of Jobs, Tourism and Innovation, said he won’t provide the list of exemptions British Columbia has sought because the negotiations are ongoing.

“Making public our negotiating positions would undercut our leverage not only in the CETA talks but in other negotiations as well,” he told HuffPost.

Manitoba, however, said it had put forward a lengthy list of exemptions with Manitoba Hydro at the top.

“Manitoba Hydro is Manitoba’s oil. Every year, it brings hundreds of millions of dollars into our provincial economy. We’re continuing to build it for future generations, for reliability and to secure international export sales,” said Jodee Mason, a press secretary for the province’s cabinet.

Mason said Manitoba and its lead negotiator met regularly with municipalities and consulted them throughout the negotiations. As far as they are aware, not one municipality passed a motion asking to be excluded from CETA.

Quebec, which pushed for the EU free trade deal, believes it may reap greater benefit from CETA than other provinces because of pre-existing commercial roots on the other side of the Atlantic, its geographic proximity to the European market and a shared culture.

Jean-Pierre D’Auteuil, a spokesman in Quebec’s Department of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade, told HuffPost that nothing in CETA would prevent its municipalities from pursuing their socio-economic goals.

“Municipalities will be able to continue to adopt and modify rules, as long as these rules are applied in a non-discriminatory fashion,” D’Auteuil said.

Federation of Canadian Municipalities President Karen Leibovici, who speaks on behalf of the umbrella organization representing municipalities across the country, said the FCM identified several concerns about CETA: that procurement thresholds were too low, that new administration processes could increase costs, that the barring of preferential treatment for country of origin would negatively impact the strategic or public interest considerations of municipalities, that transit and environmental protection should be allowed “within reason” and that the municipalities would have a role to play in the dispute resolution process.

Without a final draft to examine, it’s too early to say if the deal has met the federation’s expectations, said Leibovici, a city councillor in Edmonton.

But she’s confident International Trade Minister Ed Fast and Canada’s lead negotiator Steve Verheul will defend the interests of municipalities. The men have pledged to uphold a list of seven guiding principles put forward by the federation, she said.

If municipalities have specific concerns they should speak to their province and work with municipal and territorial associations, Leibovici said.

The Council of Canadians, along with CUPE, is urging municipalities to do just that.

“CETA is not about trade at all,” Maude Barlow, the Council’s national chairperson, told HuffPost in an email. “Most trade with Europe is tariff free now. CETA is about giving corporations in Canada the right to challenge European rules that protect domestic economies, jobs, farmers and resources and European corporations the right to do the same in Canada.”

Ed Fast’s spokesman Rudy Husny insists CETA will be a boon for Canada and will open the largest procurement market in the world, worth about $2.3-trillion annually, while boosting job opportunities in this country.

“There are no costs — there are only benefits; we are going to remove tariffs and we are going to increase trade,” Husny said.

Nothing in the agreement will prevent governments from regulating in the public interest, in areas such as the environment, labour and health and safety, Husny added.

Local governments will be allowed to continue to give preferential treatment to hometown companies through grants, loans and fiscal incentives, he said, while research and development, financial services, public administration, education and health care will all be excluded from the deal.

Brianna Ames, press secretary to Ontario’s Economic Development Minister Brad Duguid, noted Ottawa has asked for exclusions for health care, public education, and social services, such as child care, welfare and employment insurance, but she would not discuss what exemptions or exclusions Ontario has sought because the negotiations are still ongoing.

“We are pursuing in these negotiations the best deal. We can’t look at things in isolation,” she said.

Any requests by municipalities to be exempted from the trade deal would have to be agreed to by the parties and could impact other areas of the discussion, she said.

“At this stage of the discussions, it is to be determined how those requests would be treated,” Ames added.

“WE ARE GOING TO GET STIFFED”

Stone, the New Tecumseh councillor, doesn’t trust Ontario to a sign a deal that won’t penalize his community.

“We’ve heard that before, ‘Trust us, eh? We’re from the government, we are here to help you.’ That’s almost like an oxymoron. No, I think we are going to get stiffed,” he told HuffPost.

Ontario kept municipalities in the dark and, as representatives of the level of government closest to the people, Stone feels citizens are being excluded.

Dhaliwal said B.C. municipalities are getting the run-a-around from their province, which is insisting it is not at liberty to inform them about the status of the negotiations.

“For us, it’s far too late if the ink is already put in the paper to say well this is in and this is out,” he said.

Everyone believes in international trade agreements, Dhaliwal said, but the municipalities are concerned CETA will affect the delivery of services that councillors like himself are responsible for providing to their residents and they want the opportunity to propose certain changes or give their endorsement.

“We want to make sure that they are not going to suffer, but we won’t know, I don’t think we’ll ever know because by the time we hear about it everything will be signed, sealed and delivered.”

Wealthiest 1% earn 10 times more than average Canadian

http://www.cbc.ca

Canada’s rich earn on average $381,300 a year and are mostly male, white and married
The Canadian Press      Sep 11, 2013 10:00 AM ET

The gap between those who can afford luxuries like this Lamborghini sports car being ogled by some Vancouver cyclists, above, and those who can't even come close to doing so is growing in Canada and the U.S. In Canada, the wealthiest one per cent earn an average of $381,300 a year, compared to a meagre $38,700 for the average Canadian. The gap between those who can afford luxuries like this Lamborghini sports car being ogled by some Vancouver cyclists, above, and those who can’t even come close to doing so is growing in Canada and the U.S. In Canada, the wealthiest one per cent earn an average of $381,300 a year, compared to a meagre $38,700 for the average Canadian. (Andy Clark/Reuters)

For all the growing diversity the 2011 census and related surveys have portrayed in Canada, Wednesday’s final release of data from the National Household Survey reveals a contrasting constant: the richest of the rich in Canada are married, middle-aged, white men.

The rest of us are up to our eyeballs in mortgage debt.

Statistics Canada has published the final batch of data from its new and controversial National Household Survey — the survey meant to stand in for the long-form census scrapped by the Conservatives in 2010. The release was delayed for a month because of a glitch in the agency’s formulas.

CENSUS TRENDS Housing and income across Canada

It shows that the median family income in Canada is $76,000 — generally higher in the west than the east — while the median individual income is just $27,600. That means just as many individuals earn less than $27,600 as earn more.

The richest 10 per cent of individuals are making more than $80,400. And the very rich — the 272,600 individuals who make up the top one per cent — are all making more than $191,100.

Those people are making an average of $381,300 each, 10 times the average Canadian income of $38,700. The large discrepancy between the median and the average suggests there is a very small percentage of the super-rich.

A similar income gap was recently highlighted in the U.S. by an analysis of Internal Revenue Service data that found that the divide between the wealthiest one per cent and the rest is the biggest it has been since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The analysis, by economists from the University of California, Berkeley, the Paris School of Economics and Oxford University, found that the wealthiest one per cent saw their income increase by 31.4 per cent between 2009 and 2012 while the income of the 99 percent grew only by 0.4 per cent.

Wealthy conform to traditional family structure

In Canada, the portrait of the rich differs starkly from the portrait of Canadians in general that has been exposed in previous releases of the census and NHS. Data up till now have shown an increasingly diverse population — aging, but also multi-racial, open to unconventional family structures, with women making huge strides in the workplace.

The rich, on the other hand, are a throwback to the old days: overwhelmingly male, between the ages of 45 and 54, almost always married or living in a common-law relationship.

CENSUS TRENDS How much money do people in your neighbourhood make?

Education clearly pays. Despite recent questioning of the value of university degrees, more than two thirds of the top one per cent had a university degree, compared to 20.9 per cent of the total population. And almost a quarter of those who had a university degree had found a way to work themselves into the top 10 per cent of income earners.

“The high income is really reflective of the old Canada, which is much less diverse,” said Doug Norris, chief demographer at Environics Analytics.

But as immigrant populations become more established and as women gain ground in the workplace, the income data will slowly start to reflect the broader diversity of the population, he predicted.

“Over time, I think you’ll see that diversity creeping in.”

Immigrants making more than median

Already, the NHS shows that second-generation immigrants are making far more money than the national median. And ethnic groups that are well-established in Canada, such as Japanese immigrants, are also well above the median.

As for the other end of the spectrum, the bottom 10 per cent of income earners tend to live in cities, especially Montreal. Low-income neighbourhoods are known for their high proportions of visible minorities and recent immigrants, and a preponderance of single parents.

While the national median annual income for a full-time worker is $50,699, the median for a visible-minority worker is just $45,128. For a First Nations full-time worker, the median income is $41,684.

The highest income in Canada is found in the Alberta oilsands in the census agglomeration known as Wood Buffalo, which takes in the city of Fort McMurray and surrounding communities, where median family income is $186,782.

It’s almost impossible, however, to figure out from the data whether income inequality has increased since the last census in 2006. The government agency refuses to discuss history, and the data released on Wednesday was interspersed with large boxes of warnings not to undertake amateur comparisons.

That’s because the NHS data was collected in a voluntary survey that likely has a bias in favour of higher income respondents while the 2006 census was a mandatory survey with fewer biases. Tables buried in a technical document show some measures of poverty climbing over the past five years while another set of tables shows it falling.

“In here, we start with the premise we’re not doing trends,” said Brian Murphy, a special adviser on income for Statistics Canada. “The NHS, to me, is one piece of the puzzle.”

69% of households own home

Norris crunched some of the numbers himself and adjusted for inflation, finding that median family income climbed by about six per cent nationally between the last census and now. The biggest leap was in the Fort McMurray, where median family income jumped 33 per cent. Families in St. John’s saw their median incomes rise 18 per cent over the five years.

Statistics Canada does, however, venture to make some basic historical comparisons when it comes to mortgage debt and home ownership.

The NHS shows that 69 per cent of households in Canada own their home, up only slightly from the 2006 census after a long, historical climb in home ownership.

Canadians have paid a price for their tendency to buy instead of rent.

More than 25.2 per cent of households are spending more than 30 per cent of their income on shelter, surpassing the standard measure for having an affordable home. That’s up slightly from 24.9 per cent in 2006.

Of those living in an unaffordable home, 83 per cent of them were saddled with a mortgage.

Overall, 58.6 per cent of homeowners were still paying off their mortgages according to the 2011 survey. That’s up from 57.9 per cent in 2006 and 55.2 in 2001. In 1991, it was 51.5 per cent.

Toronto was the most costly city to maintain a home, at $1,366 a month, while Trois-Rivières, Que., was the cheapest at $697.

TPP countries to negotiate tariffs in Washington late September

Kyodo News International

The 12 Pacific Rim countries involved in the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade negotiations are arranging a working group meeting on tariffs from Sept. 20 to 23 in Washington, negotiation sources said Wednesday.

The meeting of the market access working group that deals with tariff cuts and eliminations will likely coincide with the meeting of TPP chief negotiators, set to be held in Washington on Sept. 18-21, as the countries seek to facilitate the talks and conclude a deal by the year-end.

In addition, ministers of the TPP countries are expected to hold their own meetings on Oct. 3, 4 and 6, followed by a summit on Oct. 8, on the fringes of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum meeting in Bali, Indonesia, a government official said.

As the TPP countries agreed in late July to put 95 percent of their respective tariff lines on the negotiation table by Sept. 20, the upcoming working group meeting is likely to start with the presentation of proposed tariff-free items.

Japan exchanged a list of items with Brunei, New Zealand, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru and Singapore during the 19th round of TPP negotiations that ended in Brunei last week, but the percentage of tariff-free items remained relatively low at around 80 percent.

The five TPP countries that Japan has not exchanged the list with are Australia, Canada, Chile, Vietnam and the United States. Japan plans on holding bilateral tariff negotiations separate from the working group meeting as well.

The working group on intellectual property, covering patent terms of medicine, is also set to hold its meeting in Mexico in late September, while some other working groups may also hold their meetings around the time, one negotiation source said.

The Brunei round of TPP negotiations was likely the last full-scale negotiations held, with countries expected to focus on intersessional meetings involving only one or two working groups from now on.

Aiming for a comprehensive free trade agreement, the TPP negotiations cover 21 fields, ranging from government procurement rules for public works projects to environment that involves fishing subsidies.

==Kyodo

Youth unemployment, quality of jobs a big concern: Georgetti comments on August job numbers

Friday, 6 September 2013    http://www.canadianlabour.ca

OTTAWA ― The President of the Canadian Labour Congress says that youth unemployment and the quality of jobs across the economy remain big concerns in Canada.

Ken Georgetti was commenting on the release by Statistics Canada of its Labour Force Survey for August 2013. There were 1,362,000 unemployed Canadians in August and the overall unemployment rate was 7.1%. In the 15-to-24 age group, official unemployment stood at 14.1%, an increase from 13.9% in July. Fully 48.3% of young workers were employed part-time, up from 47.9% in July. 

“Youth unemployment was too high back in July and it got even higher in August,” says Georgetti, “Most of the new jobs we saw in the entire labour force in August were part-time. People cannot build lives and support families on part-time work.”

Georgetti is calling governments and employers to invest in job creation and training. “There is a crying need for physical infrastructure and good quality social services in Canada and we have unemployed people who would be only too happy to  be working for the country’s benefit.” 

He says that Ottawa has provided billions in corporate tax giveaways in the hope  that companies would invest in job creation and training. “Those companies are  sitting on the cash instead of investing it in job creation and training. They must  put that money to work in the economy.” 

Georgetti adds that the federal government should set a new direction for assisting in job creation when it delivers its Speech from the Throne in October. 

Quick Analysis from CLC Senior Economist Angella MacEwen

There were 1.36 million unemployed workers in Canada in August 2013, and the unemployment rate was 7.1%. Small gains in employment in August offset losses in July, but the gains were concentrated in part-time work and self-employment. Gains in health care and social assistance, information, culture, and recreation, and accommodation and food services offset losses in other areas such as educational services, finance, insurance, real estate and leasing, and other services.
The real unemployment rate for young workers aged 15-24, was 19.1% in August, similar to the past three years in August and five percentage points higher than the pre-recession rate. In comparison, the real unemployment rate for workers over 25 is 8.5%, which is one percentage point higher than the pre-recession rate.
The increase in part time jobs was concentrated among young workers and women over 55. Involuntary part-time remains high at 30% among part-time workers who would like full-time work. This is compared to 25% pre-recession. The part-time rate for young workers rose to 48.3% this August, a full percentage point higher than  in  August 2012. The increase in part-time work among young workers explains why the average hours worked by students this summer fell to 23.7 per week, the first decline in hours worked since 2009.
While there were 246,100 more jobs August 2013 compared to the previous August, the labour force grew by 237,500 over the same period, so unemployment declined by a net of only 8,700 persons. 

The Canadian Labour Congress, the national voice of the labour movement, represents 3.3 million Canadian workers. The CLC brings together Canada’s national and international unions along with the provincial and territorial federations of labour and 130 district labour councils.

Web site: www.canadianlabour.ca
Follow us on Twitter @CanadianLabour

Contacts:  Angella MacEwen, CLC Senior Economist, 613-526-7412.
                 Dennis Gruending, CLC Communications: Tel. 613-526-7431.
Cell-text: 613-878-6040. Email: dgruending@clc-ctc.ca