English media ’pathetic’ in coverage of PQ secularism plan, says former premier

Martin Ouellet, Canadian Press | 13/08/27   http://news.nationalpost.com

Former Premier of Quebec Bernard Landry in 2010.

 Former Premier of Quebec Bernard Landry in 2010.  Vincenzo D’Alto / MONTREAL GAZETT

QUEBEC — The media of English Canada are to blame for pathetic, unfair coverage of the Parti Quebecois’ controversial minorities plan, according to prominent Pequistes.

A former premier called the coverage pitiful. And a current cabinet minister took to Twitter to condemn it Tuesday.

The complaints about the Anglo fourth estate came amid a furor over an impending plan by the PQ government to restrict public employees’ right to wear religious clothing.

In an interview with The Canadian Press, ex-premier Bernard Landry said he can’t accept some of the complaints directed at the Quebecois.

“I take pity on some of Canada’s English newspapers,” Landry said.

“It’s infuriating but it’s so pathetic to go and say that Quebec is xenophobic and racist — when from the start of our national adventure we intermingled with Amerindians. The majority of us have Amerindian roots, one-quarter of us have Irish roots, we have had six premiers of Irish origin. What are these people talking about? Why are they so misinformed in the rest of Canada?…

“Do they think our culture minister was born on Ile d’Orleans? It’s [Cameroonian native] Maka Kotto. We [the PQ] elected the first black person in the Quebec national assembly. The Bloc Quebecois elected the first Latino to the Parliament of Canada. They should open their eyes.”

Landry made a prediction: that the rest of Canada will one day “deeply regret” having embraced the doctrine of multiculturalism.

He says it leads to a lack of integration that harms social cohesion and, pointing to Europe, he says that ultimately risks feeding right-wing extremist politics over time.

“Multiculturalism will lead to more and more problems, like in Great Britain. In Holland, in Germany, same thing. Angela Merkel came out against this doctrine a while ago. Immigrants themselves are the first victims of multiculturalism,” he said.

“In the U.S., you never see a police officer with a turban. There are things worth regulating and I hope it gets done [here].

“The rule is, when you change country, you change country. They can’t expect to find everything here that they had in their country of origin. Intergration is a powerful signal that they need to adjust to a new nation.

“And the majority of them do it wonderfully.”

In fact, following Landry’s remarks, people shared images and anecdotes on social media of U.S. law-enforcement officers wearing turbans.

There’s also some research that suggests Canada’s approach to integrating immigrants has worked comparably well.

In the U.S., you never see a police officer with a turban. There are things worth regulating and I hope it gets done [here]

The most recent international Migrant Integration Policy Index placed Canada at No. 3, behind Sweden and Portugal, by using 148 criteria to measure successful integration.

The PQ says it will put forward its Charter of Quebec Values within several weeks, and seek to get it through the legislature.

Critics have called the plan unconstitutional, or worse.

A leaked version of the proposal says the government would bar public employees from wearing religious clothing — such as turbans, kippas, hijabs and visible crucifixes.

The plan may have enough support to be adopted in the legislature. The opposition Coalition Avenir Quebec says it would support parts of the plan, although it would apply the rules to far fewer public-sector workers.

The idea has majority public support in Quebec, according to polls, but it’s far from clear that such support would translate into more votes for the PQ.

Landry, 76, was briefly premier after he replaced the retiring Lucien Bouchard in 2001. He lost the 2003 provincial election.

A Jesuit-trained former lawyer, economist, civil servant, university professor and cabinet minister, Landry was best known in politics for a sharp tongue that once compared the Canadian flag to “bits of red rag.”

He wasn’t the only Pequiste to take a swipe at the Anglo-Canadian media on Tuesday.

The province’s Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Alexandre Cloutier, who is also the minister of “sovereigntist governance,” used Twitter to take a swipe at pieces in the Calgary Herald and National Post.

“Being called a xenophobe by the Calgary Herald,” he said, in remarks he repeated about the other newspaper. “Once again, a lack of perspective and understanding from the ROC.”

It’s not only Anglo pundits blasting the idea, though.

Although the editorial-writers in French have been less unanimous than their Anglo counterparts on the subject, numerous columns have denounced the PQ plan — a minority in the Journal de Montreal, but especially in Montreal La Presse.

One Tuesday in La Presse, by the newspaper’s chief editorial writer, called it an extreme measure that smacks of intolerance. He compared it to Maurice Duplessis’ persecution of Jehovah’s Witnesses in a piece titled, “The Tyranny of the Majority.”

Another in the same newspaper called it a manufactured crisis by the PQ, and urged respect for minority rights.

A column in the same newspaper last week compared the PQ approach to McCarthyism and, using the crude eight-letter English term for bovine droppings, pointed out the government’s inconsistency in preaching state secularism while keeping the crucifix in the legislature.

A pair of representatives from minority organizations interviewed Tuesday expressed concern about the direction Quebec politics was headed.

And they weren’t blaming English media.

David Ouellette, spokesman for the Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs, said things got tense in part thanks to sensational media coverage within Quebec a few years ago.

That news coverage created political pressure, amid which the then-Charest Liberal government created a commission to explore minority accommodations.

“Certain media milked it with very tempestuous and virulent declarations during the commission’s hearings, which created a climate of uncertainty for minorities in Quebec,” he said.

Why is the government reviving this debate and unleashing dangerous passions?

“Why is the government reviving this debate and unleashing dangerous passions?”

Mukhbir Singh, a spokesman for the World Sikh organization of Canada, says community members in Montreal are genuinely concerned about the PQ proposal and the direction the province is headed in. Especially because it comes on the heels of the short-lived Quebec turban ban in soccer.

“I think we’re seeing a progression here that’s worrying everyone,” the organization’s vice-president for Quebec and Atlantic Canada said in an interview.

Some federal politicians have also weighed in to blast the plan, including Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney and NDP Leader Tom Mulcair.

With files from Peter Rakobowchuk

C.E.T.A: “Final Push” In September

By Terry Wilson      August 21, 2013    http://canadianawareness.org

Canadian trade minister Ed Fast says negotiations with the Europe Union are re-launching early next month in a final push to complete a comprehensive deal, adding all that is needed is a “little flexibility” on both sides.

“Early in September we will be re-engaging and there’s no reason to believe that with a little bit of flexibility on both sides that we can’t resolve the remaining outstanding issues,” Fast said “There’s only a very small handful of outstanding issues and we’re trying to bring some creative approaches to try to bridge those gaps.”

He gave no specifics but sources have said the major stumbling blocks include the EU’s reluctance to allow more access for Canadian beef and pork, outstanding issues on drug patents, financial services and provincial procurements.

“We’re getting very close,” Fast said in a telephone interview from Brunei, where the minister was engaged in two other trade liberalizing initiatives with the 10-nation ASEAN pact and the 12-country TransPacific Partnership. Source: theglobeandmail.com

Never heard of C.E.T.A (Comprehensive economic trade agreement)? Here are two great video’s that show what it will do for Canada.

 

 

It is a well know fact that the European Union was started with trade agreements. We now are seeing this on a global scale, ushering in globalization.

Nafta, then the SPP agreement, and now the North American Security Perimeter Deal will become facets of the North American trading block (similar to the EU). The same is/has been done in other regions of the world (Asian Pacific Union, African Union, etc.). The “deals” like C.E.T.A and the TPP. Will be the global “trade” regulations between the Unions.

If we are to preserve what is left of Canadian sovereignty and resist the coming corporate run world government that is being built up before our very eyes. We must (peacefully) fight against these agreements with everything that we have!

National Post editorial board: Shameful silence on Quebec’s xenophobia

    National Post Editorial Board   August 27, 2013

Why has one of Quebec's most prominent politicians not spoken out against the PQ's xenophobic plans?

NDP Federal Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair claims issue is moot, believing it’s against the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Prime Minister Harper has been completely mute on the subject, the federal Conservatives believing it’s a debate for the provincial level to sort out.

Nearly a quarter century has passed since the RCMP decided it was no big deal for Baltej Singh Dhillon to serve while wearing his turban. Although the issue was passionately debated at the time, most Canadians quickly realized that a civil servant’s headgear hasn’t much to do with his job performance.

Yet all these years later, Pauline Marois’ provincial government in Quebec — along with many of her supporters, if polls are to be believed — still haven’t come to terms with this fact. The intolerant spirit behind the Parti Québécois’ proposed “Charter of Quebec Values” betrays the sort of sour antipathy toward religious symbols that the rest of the country said goobye to in the 1980s and ’90s.

According to a Journal de Montréal report last week, Ms. Marois’ government intends to pursue legislation such that “public employees, including civil servants, judges, police, doctors, nurses and teachers, would be forbidden from wearing ‘conspicuous’ religious symbols such as the Jewish kippa, the Muslim hijab and the Sikh turban.” It’s hard to say whether Ms. Marois is a genuine xenophobe looking to sanitize the province’s workforce in her own secularist Québécois image; or whether she is merely seeking to stir up her nativist base with an ugly wedge issue; or a little of both. But whatever her motivation, the legislation is an insult to Canadian values.

The idea that a teacher, daycare worker, transportation ministry clerk or nurse should have to choose between public service and a publicly visible symbol of his or her personal faith is counterproductive in every economic and social sense. You can’t help immigrants integrate by putting barriers between them and the public workforce. And when outraged emergency room surgeons and other sought-after professionals consider leaving the province rather than comply with a discriminatory law, theory again collides with reality. When you’re wheeled into the McGill University Health Centre in critical condition, do you want the best surgeon, or do you want the one who best conforms to some politician’s conception of “Quebec values”?

In the face of this demagoguery, it is heartening to see some prominent figures criticizing the idea. That includes federal Liberal leader Justin Trudeau, who suggested people were “laugh[ing] at Quebecers,” and renowned philosopher Charles Taylor, who called Ms. Marois’ plan “Putinesque.”

Unfortunately, NDP leader Tom Mulcair, consistent with his overall pattern of running scared from anything that might offend the lowest common denominator of Quebec public opinion, has refused to denounce Ms. Marois’ initiative. He broke his silence on the issue on Monday — but only to claim that the whole matter is moot, since the new law would be contrary to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That’s an extraordinarily silly thing to say given that Ms. Marois would be only too pleased to trash the Charter if things came to that. (Even Coalition Avenir Quebec leader Francois Legault, who effectively holds the balance of power in Quebec’s minority legislature, says that he would urge the use of the Constitution’s notwithstanding clause to protect the sections of the Charter of Quebec Values that he supports.)

As for the federal Conservatives, they have been completely mute — except for a vague tweet last week from Jason Kenney. “It’s a debate that will occur at the provincial level,” was all the Prime Minister’s Office would say. Meanwhile, Andrew Bennett, appointed as Canada’s first “ambassador of religious freedom” by the Conservatives amid much fanfare, refused to comment — because he has eyes only for threats to religious freedom that take place outside Canada’s borders. So, if a law such as Ms. Marois’ were being enacted in, say, Rhode Island, his office would be all over it. In Quebec? Not so much.

This is becoming a farce. Both the NDP and Conservatives trumpet their concern for human rights. Yet here we have a clear case of a xenophobic provincial government trying to restrict the religious freedom of Canadian citizens, and the Prime Minister and leader of the opposition both do nothing but hum and haw. It is a pathetic display of political cowardice, and one that voters should remember, come the next election, when both men sing their well-rehearsed odes to “Canadian values.”

National Post