BC Ferries Seeks Input On Revised Draft Schedules For The Southern Gulf Islands

Capture421

BC Ferries Seeks Input On Revised Draft Schedules  For The Southern Gulf Islands

Online Survey Open From Nov 23 – Dec 14, 2015

VICTORIA – BC Ferries is looking for input from its customers regarding adjustments made to the draft schedules for the Southern Gulf Islands based on the valuable feedback the company heard during a series of open houses held during the summer.

“While we’ve done a great deal of analysis and traffic modelling, we know that getting our customers’ input is just as important,” said Mark Collins, BC Ferries’ Vice President of Strategic Planning & Community Engagement. “Trying to balance the competing wants and needs of five islands (Salt Spring, Galiano, Pender, Mayne and Saturna) is a challenge and requires careful consideration before making any adjustments.”

The schedules now being presented support customers’ desire for sailing times and routing that more closely model the current schedules, with added improvements that BC Ferries believes ferry users will appreciate. The company is striving to preserve many of the benefits of the schedules presented at the public open houses, while addressing concerns raised at those meetings.

Highlights of the updated draft schedules include:
• The off-peak schedules are similar to current service.
• In the shoulder seasons, weekend service will be increased with the second new Salish Class vessel.
• In the peak season, there will be more sailing opportunities while maintaining inter- island connections on weekdays, as well as improvements from Tsawwassen to the Southern Gulf Islands on weekends.

To view the revised draft schedules and participate in the online survey, visit bcferries.com. The survey is open from now until December 14.

After BC Ferries analyzes the results of the survey, the company will communicate the Southern Gulf Island schedules with a Phase 3 survey.

The new schedule is expected to be finalized in the spring of 2016, for implementation in the spring of 2017.

Under contract to the Province of British Columbia, BC Ferries is the service provider responsible for the delivery of safe, efficient and dependable ferry service along coastal British Columbia.

B.C. Liberals refuse to look at alternatives to putting Hydro customers on $800 million hook

May 12, 2014

VICTORIA – Today, the B.C. Liberal government shut the door on independent expert review of the Site C project proposal, leaving B.C. Hydro customers on the hook for a loss of $800 million should the project go forward on the government’s timeline.

According to the panel’s report “B.C. Hydro projects losing $800 million in the first 4 years of operation,” under the government’s project timelines.

“Families are already facing a 28 per cent rate hike because of the B.C. Liberals’ complete mismanagement of B.C. Hydro,” said B.C. New Democrat leader John Horgan. “Now families will be on the hook for an $800 million loss because the B.C. Liberals are steamrolling ahead before the demand is there.”

The Joint Review Panel for the Site C project released its report last Thursday, recommending that the B.C. Liberal government “refer the load forecast and demand side management plan details to the B.C. Utilities Commission,” and have the BCUC review the proposed project’s costs.

Today in Question Period, B.C. Liberal Minister of Energy & Mines, Bill Bennett refused to refer the project to the BCUC to independently investigate alternatives that would limit ratepayers’ liabilities.

“Right now, we have Liberals telling Liberals what Liberals want to hear,” said Horgan. “That’s a reckless and irresponsible approach to such a massive project. We need an independent expert review to protect the ratepaying public.”

We Lose When B.C. Government Listens To Bond Raters Over Citizens

Susan Lambert  Susan Lambert     Past President, B.C. Teachers’ Federation

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca    05/05/2014

Peter Cameron’s warnings that the economic skies of B.C. will fall should government negotiate a fair contract for B.C.’s teachers reminded me of Doug Foster’s testimony in the historic court case won by the B.C. Teachers’ Federation this spring.

Foster, assistant deputy finance minister and unabashed fervent apostle of “free market” based economic policy, testified that the province invites bond raters to advise as provincial budgets are developed. That advice is designed to “keep taxes low and constrain spending” in return for a good credit rating.

Foster testified the bond raters are wary of all spending, including capital projects, and are staunchly opposed to deficit budgets. The net zero mandate was approved of by these raters who promised to maintain the triple AAA rating only with the caution that the mandate be maintained.

Foster also testified that government agreed with the raters that the economy was fragile, even though this analysis was contradicted in the government’s message to the people of B.C.

Colin Hansen, the finance minister at the time, painted a rosy picture of the economy in the province, talking about B.C. as one of the strongest leaders in economic growth in Canada attributable to the success of the Olympics, the ability to pay down the debt by $9 billion, and projections of personal income increases of three to four per cent among other favourable indicators.

So Cameron’s warnings connect some economic dots for me. Seems like the bond raters, firms like Standard and Poors found to be complicit in the 2008 global economic crisis, are once again “advising” government. These are the people in favour of an alternative vision of Canada, (one in which the 1% have both economic and political clout and can dictate policies that increase the numbers of homeless, impoverished and dispirited in an increasingly mean world), who are coercing our government with the financial equivalent of the fabled carrot and stick.

Rather than charting our own course as citizens of this province and probably this country, we are being held to ransom by the rogues and villains who profit from low taxes, smaller government and free markets.

These are the greedy charlatans who preach “trickle down” economics and promote private rather than public services. Who are supported by corporations with production and supply lines in Bangladesh where there are no regulations or unions to protect workers from exploitation, violation and death in order to profit when these goods are sold for enormous returns here in B.C.

And what effect has this “free market” driven economic policy had on public services in this province? You don’t have to look further than your local school board struggling to identify yet further cuts to the programs and services that once made the system the strongest in the world.

We have the highest child poverty rate in the country. Mary Ellen Turpel Lafond has recently revealed that we have, across the province, fewer services for children than there are in the city of Calgary.

As this government heeds the advice of free market economists, so does our investment in public services decline. These neo-liberal economic policies are supposed to be beneficial for all, but we see the stark reversal of that promise.

The hope of jobs is fading as the promise is pushed further and further back on the horizon. Public services are declining. And costs to ordinary citizens are increasing. When will we ever learn?

Follow Susan Lambert on Twitter: www.twitter.com/susant8404

BC Government Leaving School Districts In No Win Situation

 

Just-saying

April 23, 201 4

By Andrew Chernoff     https://andrewchernoff.wordpress.com                                   

It should be clear by now. Talk is cheap.

The BC government is not open for business. The doors are closed and their ears are plugged.

The headlines say it all:

From angry teachers, to fuming Cupe education workers, boisterous parents, and frustrated school trustees, it is clear it is not working.

Can civil disobedience be far off the horizon? Just saying….

Or are all these headlines just full of talk, emotion, frustration with no real substance or desire to make real change….to make a real difference…to actually act and put it all on the line, in the streets, on the provincial legislature?

HELLO???!!!!!

For what should be a galvanizing issue….it sure is lonely out here all alone….just saying.