Libs core review to look at ‘alternative service delivery’

https://i0.wp.com/thetyee.ca/ui/img/logo.png

By Colleen Kimmett    Published July 31, 2013  http://thetyee.ca

 

Every hospital, university, crown corporation and government ministry will be under scrutiny in the provincial core review planned for this fall.

Energy and mines minister Bill Bennett announced today the terms of reference for the review, which aims to reduce spending by $100 million over the next two years.

“We intend to leave no stone unturned. We know government has already done a good job of managing costs, but we also know more can always be done. This review is about putting the taxpayer and families at the forefront of our decision-making process,” stated Bennett in a press release.

According to a ministry backgrounder, among the objectives of the review are:

– to focus ministry programs and activities on “achieving government’s vision of a strong economy”;

– to eliminate overlap and duplication between ministries;

– to reduce red tap and unnecessary regulations that hinder economic development;

– to ensure public sector management wage levels are appropriate.

The review will also “confirm government’s core responsibilities and eliminate programs that could provide better service at less cost through alternative service delivery models” a move which in the 2001 Liberal government core review meant privatization.

Resulting budget cuts of that review also eliminated thousands of jobs on a day civil servants called Black Tuesday.

Earlier this month, Bennett told The Times Colonist that with this core review, “you’re not going to see anything like a Black Tuesday or anything like that.” However, he also said, “I hope we’re able to find ways of spending less money without people losing their jobs. That’s definitely what I’m hoping. But I can’t guarantee that’s going to be the case.”

In an op-ed in the Vancouver Sun today, NDP MLA Shane Simpson said that, while “the idea of a core review is not in itself a bad thing. . . we don’t know whether this is to be a comprehensive review that will have real value, or if it will mean widespread service cuts to ministries already struggling to meet unsustainable budgets due to the Liberals’ unrealistic bogus budget being re-introduced this week.”

A working group on the core review is expected to have recommendations ready for cabinet approval by December 31, 2014.

Colleen Kimmett is a senior editor at The Tyee.

christy Clark announces “core review” of government programs

Goal of review: reduce overall program spending by $50 million this year

July 30, 2013   Andrew Phillip Chernoff

One of the cabinet’s first tasks will be a “core review” of government programs, with a target of reducing overall program spending by $50 million this year, it was announced today.

Energy and Mines Minister Bill Bennett is in charge of the cost-cutting exercise, and is to release terms of reference for it on Wednesday.

Clark has described this core review as different from the one that former premier Gordon Campbell led after the B.C. Liberal Party formed government in 2001. The new review will focus on identifying functions that don’t need to be done by government, and reducing excessive regulation that Clark described as a natural accumulation of all governments over time.

Premier Clark made the announcement  in Vancouver when she took a break from cabinet meetings to be sworn in as MLA for Westside-Kelowna.

Premiers urged to hold public hearings on Canada-EU trade deal

 

 

The Canadian Press
Published Monday, July 22, 2013 6:37AM EDT

OTTAWA — Critics of the free trade talks with Europe are urging provinces to ensure any negotiated deal gets a full public airing before it is formally signed.

The Trade Justice Network and Quebec-based Le Reseau quebecois sur l’integration continentale has sent premiers a letter in advance of their meeting in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont., next week, saying the federal review mechanism is not sufficient.

The umbrella groups, which represent unions and civil society organizations, say provinces must step in because “the current federal government has rejected virtually every amendment proposed by opposition parties to every trade agreement that has come before Parliament for review.”

The Harper government has made a successful Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with 28 European Union nations a key economic and political goal — it would constitute the only major free trade deal since NAFTA two decades ago.

Unlike trade talks of the past, however, Canadian provinces have had to be directly involved in the process since some of the biggest issues — such as liberalized government procurement and public hydro-electricity tenders — fall under provincial jurisdiction.

As well, expected extensions in pharmaceutical patent protections will likely result in higher provincial health care costs.

With so much involved, the groups say the provinces must hold public hearings, adding there is precedent for doing so.

“If there is a difference between the CETA and these other trade and investment agreements it is surely that the Canada–EU agreement will have far greater impacts on provincial sovereignty, as well as on policy flexibility at all levels, including municipally,” the letter notes.

“We therefore urge your government, and the Council of the Federation, to champion the idea of a democratic review of the CETA in between conclusion of the negotiations and a formal signing of the agreement.”

Adam Taylor, a spokesman for International Trade Minister Ed Fast, insisted Sunday that the talks with the European Union are the most transparent and collaborative trade negotiations Canada has ever conducted.

“From the beginning, provinces and territories have been active participants, and municipalities and stakeholders from across the country from a variety of sectors have been consulted regularly,” Taylor wrote in an email to The Canadian Press.

“Together, we are working hard to conclude an agreement that generates benefits in every region of the country and creates jobs, growth and long-term prosperity for Canadian exporters, workers and families,” he said.

Most analysts believe a deal could be signed in principle this fall, despite several missed deadlines.

Officials on both sides of the Atlantic contend only a few difficult issues remain to be resolved, including expanded access for Canadian beef exports and European demands that Canada allow more imports of European dairy products.

But analysts also warn momentum could be stalled if the talks are not concluded quickly, particularly as the European Union is refocusing its attention on a deal with the more lucrative market in the United States.

Ottawa has maintained a deal could boost Canada’s economy by $12 billion and create about 80,000 jobs, although critics say the benefits are exaggerated.