Teachers may begin full-scale strike after losing LRB decision on 10 per cent pay cut

Teachers to vote on Monday and Tuesday

By Tracy Sherlock, Postmedia News June 4, 2014 8:28 PM

Teachers across B.C. could embark on a full-scale strike within the next two weeks after a vote next Monday and Tuesday, their leader said Wednesday after the Labour Relations Board ruled a 10-per-cent pay cut would stand.

“Even before the LRB ruling, the BCTF executive decided last night that it’s time to apply the maximum pressure,” said Jim Iker, president of the B.C. Teachers’ Federation. “The vote itself will apply pressure to both sides. There is still time for the government to act to prevent a full strike.”

The Labour Relations Board on Wednesday dismissed the B.C. Teachers’ Federation’s application to declare the employer’s lockout and 10-per-cent wage cut illegal.

“ … Subject to the designation of essential services, the Employer is free to engage in lockout activities including imposing new terms of employment in order to pressure the Union into reaching a new collective agreement,” LRB vice-chairman Richard Longpre wrote in his decision.

“I do not accept the suggestion that once a designation has been issued by the Board and regardless of the scope of that designation, the parties must comply with the terms and conditions of the collective agreement until such time as either party applies to the Board to amend the order.”

The teachers could still refer the measures to arbitration and all decisions of the LRB can be appealed within 15 days.

Teachers have been holding rotating strikes since May 26, with several school districts closed each day. The partial lockout restricts teachers from working during recess or lunch hours, or from arriving at school any earlier than 45 minutes before classes start, or staying 45 minutes after they end, and includes the pay cut.

At issue are wages, class size, class composition and the number of specialist teachers. The employer is offering a 7.3-per-cent wage increase over six years. Teachers on Tuesday reduced their ask by one per cent, now calling for 12.75 over four years. The BCTF also says it moved on several other issues on Tuesday, including benefits, pay for teachers on call and preparation time.

BC Teacher Collective Bargaining: Latest bargaining proposals from the union and the government

http://www.bcpsea.bc.ca   June 4, 2014

Provincial bargaining with the BC Teachers’ Federation resumed on October 30, 2013. Facilitator Mark Brown is assisting the parties.

Employers’ Partial Lockout Notice

Consolidated Questions and Answers on matters related to the BCTF Strike and the Employers’ Partial Lockout

Question and Answers

Backgrounders

For the Record
BCPSEA Responses to BCTF Statements

Proposals

BCPSEA Proposals
BCTF Proposals Tabled June 3, 2014

Discussion/Resource Papers

B.C. Teachers’ Contract: Government Threatens Wage Cut

     By Keven Drews and Tamsyn Burgmann

05/16/2014

VANCOUVER – The B.C. government is threatening to cut teachers’ wages by five per cent if a new contract agreement isn’t reached by the end of the school year, but the union representing those teachers vows it will take that threat to the Labour Relations Board.

Peter Cameron, chief negotiator of the BC Public School Employers’ Association, the organization representing the provincial government, also said Friday that teachers will receive a $1,200 signing bonus if both sides reach an agreement by the end of June.

The incentives and disincentives placed on the table by the government were the latest details to emerge from a year of contentious labour relations between the B.C. Teachers Federation and the provincial government that included a 89 per cent strike vote and involved a B.C. Supreme Court judgment.

Both sides remain firmly divided over issues related to wages, class size, the composition of those classes and the length of the contract term.

“The proposal we have on the table to try and get a settlement, and the disincentives that we are putting in place are all aimed at getting a deal, and in fact the disincentives will rise if there’s further job action,” said Cameron. “So if they do move to Stage 2 we will, it’s pretty well definite that we’ll have a further response to that.”

The purpose of the government’s actions, he added, is not to try and provoke further strike action but to “provoke a settlement.”

Both sides were back at the bargaining table Friday, and B.C. Teachers’ Federation president Jim Iker said his members will deal with the threat of the five per cent pay cut at the Labour Relations Board.

He said the government still hasn’t addressed issues related to class size and composition and specialist teachers, and the government’s offer of a 6.5-per-cent pay hike over six years isn’t enough. On Thursday, Education Minister Peter Fassbender announced the provincial government was dropping its demand of a 10-year contract.

“They need to put some proposals to get us closer to a deal, including preparation time,” said Iker. “Bargaining is about compromise, and we want a compromise.

But Cameron said teachers are demanding a pay raise of 15.9 per cent over four years. With increased benefits and other factors taken into consideration, the total compensation package demanded by teachers is about 21 per cent, he added.

“We need to see some movement from the union now to come into the ball park because they’re at this point still far, far away from the settlement pattern of all the other unions.”

On Thursday, the B.C. government and the 11-union, 47,000-strong Facilities Bargaining Association announced a tentative deal that would see unionized workers receive a 5.5 per cent over five years.

The teachers have been without a contract since last June. In early March, some 26,051 members of the B.C. Teachers’ Federation voted overwhelmingly in favour of job action, and in April, the union began Stage 1 of its job action.

Teachers stopped supervising students outside the classroom or communicating in writing with administrators, which prompted about a dozen school districts to cancel recess.

A B.C. Supreme Court decision in January awarded the federation $2 million in damages and declared the province’s removal of class size and composition from contract negotiations unconstitutional.

B.C. Liberals refuse to look at alternatives to putting Hydro customers on $800 million hook

May 12, 2014

VICTORIA – Today, the B.C. Liberal government shut the door on independent expert review of the Site C project proposal, leaving B.C. Hydro customers on the hook for a loss of $800 million should the project go forward on the government’s timeline.

According to the panel’s report “B.C. Hydro projects losing $800 million in the first 4 years of operation,” under the government’s project timelines.

“Families are already facing a 28 per cent rate hike because of the B.C. Liberals’ complete mismanagement of B.C. Hydro,” said B.C. New Democrat leader John Horgan. “Now families will be on the hook for an $800 million loss because the B.C. Liberals are steamrolling ahead before the demand is there.”

The Joint Review Panel for the Site C project released its report last Thursday, recommending that the B.C. Liberal government “refer the load forecast and demand side management plan details to the B.C. Utilities Commission,” and have the BCUC review the proposed project’s costs.

Today in Question Period, B.C. Liberal Minister of Energy & Mines, Bill Bennett refused to refer the project to the BCUC to independently investigate alternatives that would limit ratepayers’ liabilities.

“Right now, we have Liberals telling Liberals what Liberals want to hear,” said Horgan. “That’s a reckless and irresponsible approach to such a massive project. We need an independent expert review to protect the ratepaying public.”