With B.C.’s job market stalled, it’s time for a jobs plan that actually works

By Iglika Ivanova   August 14, 2013  http://rabble.ca

The latest B.C. job numbers reveal a picture of persistently high unemployment and stalled job creation. Since January, B.C.’s unemployment rate has been on a roller-coaster ride, down one month and up the next. All in all, there have been very few jobs created in 2013, far fewer than needed to employ our growing working-age population.

In fact, B.C. is a laggard in job creation this year, placing in the bottom three provinces in Canada. Only New Brunswick and Nova Scotia have created fewer jobs than us (they’ve actually seen job losses this year), while all other provinces have managed to achieve higher job growth.

This is a problem that requires governments — both federally and provincially — to take a more active position. Simply standing out of the way and waiting for foreign investors to create jobs is not going to do it; it’ll only mean that we’ll be stuck with persistently high unemployment for a long time, depriving young people of career opportunities, resulting in needless suffering of those who can’t find work, and slowing down our economy for years. We can’t afford to remain complacent.

The BC Jobs Plan isn’t going to do it. That’s because (as we’ve previously argued here), it doesn’t address the key underlying cause of our sluggish job creation — the lack of demand.

The reason why business isn’t investing and hiring more people is that the expectations for sales and profits are low. And that’s because B.C. consumers are spending less, weighed down by record high debt-levels, relatively high unemployment, family incomes that have stagnated for the last four years nationally and in B.C. have actually dropped since 2009, and a weak housing market that’s either heading for a prolonged slowdown or a crash in urban hot spots like Vancouver. None of these factors bode well for household’s new worth and future spending plans. It’s easy to see this creates a vicious circle — customers not spending means businesses don’t expand hiring, family incomes remain low, so customers spend even less.

Exporters are also having a hard time as China is slowing down, Europe is still fighting an economic slump that its own austerity policies brought on, and the U.S. is yet to recover.

To make matters worse, the B.C. government’s own policies, narrowly focused on reducing the deficit, have been working against the job market. Cost-cutting governments don’t buy things and reduce jobs (July marked the third consecutive month of job declines in the public sector for B.C.), so the slowdown continues.

The bottom line is, the economy works better when the money is circulating around, and that happens when more people have jobs and livable incomes. When consumers aren’t spending and businesses aren’t investing, the government must step in. What’s needed is a boost in family incomes that will inject money in the economy.

While provincial government policy can’t fully compensate for the global economic slowdown, and the federal government is better positioned to engage in stimulus spending, provincial governments can certainly cushion the blows. Public investments can directly create jobs and boost incomes, but they can also attract and drive private investments in infrastructure and other areas that will meet community needs.

In fact, the smartest way out of the jobs crisis is to put some of our collective resources to work on serious social and environmental problems like climate change, poverty and the affordability crisis facing many families. This way, we will create jobs in the short term while improving quality of life and setting our province up with the basis for a robust and sustainable economy in the future.

I’m talking about investments in high quality, universal and affordable early child care and education, hiring more teachers to relieve crowded classrooms in our schools and provide the needed supports for students with special needs, and boosting funding to make post-secondary education and skills training accessible to all who need it.

Other ideas for boosting job creation and our economy include: investments in making our homes, schools and hospitals more energy-efficient (which will create jobs in construction, reduce energy consumption and help us meet our climate goals), and a large-scale reforestation program post the pine-beetle devastation to breathe life into many rural communities. Youth-focused initiatives should also be on the table, to deal with the massive underemployment plaguing that cohort.

There’s no shortage of ideas. The stumbling block is that an effective job creation strategy will cost money, and this goes against the B.C. government’s current narrow focus on immediate deficit reduction.

The way to move forward is to acknowledge that without more revenues, our government can’t effectively provide the kind of leadership that’s needed at a time of persistent joblessness. And since our current fiscal challenges are the result of years of tax cuts, we can begin to address them with modest tax increases on those who, to quote Finance Minister de Jong, “have a little more” (see here and here).

While slightly higher deficits may be needed in the short term, B.C.’s in a solid position to run deficits for a few more years. The key is taking some of the idle money, the money that businesses aren’t currently investing and consumers aren’t spending, and putting them to work for the B.C. economy.

If you’re interested in looking at the numbers yourself, B.C. stats provides a good summary here and a detailed Excel spreadsheet here. For a detailed explanation of why our joblessness problem is worse than what the official unemployment rate would have you believe, see Jim Stanford’s excellent articles here and here.

West Coast Domestic Workers’ Association report urges B.C. to protect its foreign workers

by Carlito Pablo on Aug 14, 2013   http://www.straight.com

Even though Canada’s temporary-foreign-worker program comes under federal jurisdiction, provinces have the power to protect labourers, a B.C. lawyer says.

Ai Li Lim is the executive director of the West Coast Domestic Workers’ Association. On August 10, her group presented a report on temporary foreign workers at a well-attended forum at SFU Harbour Centre in downtown Vancouver.

“Yes, it’s a federal immigration program, but once the workers are here in B.C., they have to be—or they are, in theory—supported by B.C. employment standards,” Lim told the Straight during a break at the forum.

In the report, titled Access to Justice for Migrant Workers in B.C., the WCDWA outlined proposals to address “inequalities and gaps” in the program regarding the protection of workers. A number of these involve provincial legislation.

One recommendation is for B.C. to amend its Labour Relations Code to allow sectoral representation for workers in the absence of unions.

Another is for the province to look at Manitoba’s Worker Recruitment and Protection Act. This law provides a registration system for both employers and recruiters. It also prohibits the collection of fees from foreign workers in exchange for recruiters finding employment for them.

Although it is illegal in B.C. to charge workers for placing them in jobs, Lim explained that there are “loopholes” in the B.C. Employment Standards Act that allow recruiters to ask for “advertising” fees.

The WCDWA report also recommended strengthening employment standards to ensure a “more pro-active approach” to enforcement in sectors that rely on migrant labour.

Initial figures from Citizenship and Immigration Canada indicate that in 2012, 49,488 foreign workers arrived in B.C. out of a nationwide total of 213,516, the report noted. This makes the province the second-largest host of temporary workers, after Ontario.

Solidarity served at BBQ rally hosted by CUPE leaders

Aug 14, 2013    http://cupe.ca

The Bonfield Township Council meeting was cancelled by the mayor and the forecasted rain never came, but CUPE leaders led by Charles Fleury, CUPE national secretary-treasurer, Candace Rennick, CUPE Ontario secretary-treasurer and Henri Giroux, president of North Bay CUPE District Council along with CUPE members and Bonfield residents, did come out on Tuesday afternoon to show support for the striking CUPE 4616-2 members at a solidarity BBQ.

“You have the support of over 600,000 CUPE members across Canada,” said Charles Fleury, CUPE National Secretary-Treasurer, bringing greetings and support for the 16 municipal workers on strike in Bonfield. “CUPE supports your fight against concessions and we are with you every step of the way.”

Echoing brother Fleury’s remarks, Candace Rennick, CUPE Ontario secretary treasurer said: “We will stand by you and provide you with all the resources you need to win this fight.” Henri Giroux, who helped organize the event, also thanked the community for their continued support for the striking workers.

More than 150 people, from Bonfield residents to CUPE members from across the province, to local union members, brought solidarity messages and let the strikers know that they have the full support of their Ontario brothers and sisters.

Garth Pigeau, President of CUPE 4616-2 was encouraged by the support shown to his striking members and said, “Solidarity, this is what the union is all about.”

The workers have been on strike since August 1, 2013.

When Corporations Lie

From: http://operationmaple.ca

fukishima3

Fukushima: the site of the worst nuclear power plant disaster since Chernobyl along with a hotbed of corporate cover-ups and state-led lies.

Problems at Fukushima-Daiichi began as early as 1990, when the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission warned TEPCO (The Tokyo Electric Power Company) that the plant’s location – so close to seismic activity – could lead to a potential calamity. But TEPCO ignored this; and then came the March 2011 tsunami and the nuclear meltdowns.

Overnight, 160,000 people were tossed out of their home. Without compensation. Fukushima cleanup workers paid the equivalent of $10/hr were contaminated with the radioactive spray. But there was worse news to come – except this other news was kept from us, until this past week when Masayuki Ono (the head of TEPCO) was forced to admit that radioactive groundwater leakage to a tune of 300 tons has been rushing everyday into the Pacific Ocean.

Suzuki-san, a former foreman at Fukushima and 12-year TEPCO employee, believes the contamination has been occurring since the 2011 accident, but that TEPCO “didn’t want to cause an outcry” and so stayed mum. But the people themselves had a good sense of what was going on. More than a thousand fishermen in the area could not, in good conscience, fish and sell the infected fish to an unsuspecting public. So they stopped fishing, while TEPCO kept lying to the public.

fukishima2

The Fukushima disaster is a classic example of a corporation that will do anything for profits. It will lie, cause innumerable deaths to people, to fish and animal life, to the entire eco system, it doesn’t matter. And it will admit this only when it is absolutely forced or embarrassed into it. By 2012, this disaster had already cost the people of Japan over a billion US. And although the fault rests squarely with TEPCO, it is the people of Japan who are being asked once again to foot the bill. A cost that will go into the hundreds of billions. (Fisherman Kazuo Niitsuma, seen in photo, has been unable to work since the 2011 meltdown. Photograph: Justin McCurry for the Guardian)

No, corporations are no different in Canada. The Sydney Tar Ponds, known as one of the most toxic sites in North America, was abandoned by Sydney Steel and the Coke Ovens. Cost of the cleanup will be in the hundreds of millions and paid for by Canadian taxpayers. All over the Maritimes the picture is the same: fish packing plants, pulp and paper plants, gypsum plants, all left there for taxpayers to pay for cleanup. It is the same for the rest of Canada – driven through Hamilton, lately? Plant after manufacturing plant closed, left there to rot; waiting for years to pass when taxpayers will look after the cleanup costs. Why did these plants shut their doors in the first place? To go to areas with cheaper labour. Hundreds upon hundreds of millions lost but that could go for our healthcare. Schools. Nursing homes.

fukishima1

How do we change this? Corporations don’t care about our schools, healthcare and nursing homes. They care for profits, nothing else. Our government? Those politicians we elect every now and again to work for us, the people? Seriously, now, would Canada have such a world-wide anti-environmental reputation if our politicians worked for us? So who’s left?

We are. The people. The 99%. There is no one else.