Author Archives: CanucksBanter

Stop the Canada-China FIPA

Posted on by
http://leadnow.ca/stop-fipa
https://i0.wp.com/s3.amazonaws.com/leadnow/img/Stop-FIPA-actionpage.jpg
At any moment, Prime Minister Harper could pass the most secretive and sweeping trade deal of a generation.

This deal would pave the way for a massive natural resource buyout and allow foreign corporations to sue the Canadian government in secret tribunals, restricting Canadians from making democratic decisions about our economy, environment and energy.1

Most Canadians have never heard of FIPA, the Canada-China Foreign Investment Protection Agreement, because Prime Minister Harper is trying to sneak it through without a single vote or debate in Parliament.2,3

Canadians have a right to determine our future, but this agreement will undermine our democratic rights and lock us into an inescapable path of foreign-ownership and resource extraction until at least 2040.

The Canada-China FIPA could be approved any day now unless we get the word out now that the Harper Conservatives are trying bypass Parliament and sneak this deal by Canadians. That’s why we partnered with SumOfUs.org on this campaign – if enough of us raise our voices now, we can create a massive public outcry to stop this devastating deal in its tracks.

Send a message to Prime Minister Harper and your MP: stop the Canada-China FIPA and the Nexen takeover.

Go to: http://leadnow.ca/stop-fipa and fill out the email.

Alongside this deal, the Harper government is trying to sell off Nexen, a major Canadian oil and gas company, to the Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), one of China’s massive state-owned oil companies.4 The $15 billion-dollar Nexen takeover will open the floodgates to a wave of foreign buyouts of Canada’s natural resources.

If FIPA passes, a Chinese company can take over Canadian resources and then sue Canadian governments in secret, if the government does anything that threatens the company’s profits

Any Canadian law or government decision – even ones that protect Canada’s environment, create jobs and stop dangerous projects – could be fought in secret tribunals outside of our legal system. Arbitrators unaccountable to the Canadian public would have the power to award billions in damages to foreign corporations if we do anything that hurts corporate profits, like improve environmental standards or slow down the export of cheap, unprocessed resources.1,5,6

Time is running out. We have days before FIPA is set to pass into law, and the Nexen takeover could be approved at any time. Canadians, including many Conservative MPs, oppose the Nexen takeover, and Prime Minister Harper has just asked for a 30 day extension to regroup. We need a massive public outcry now.

And let’s remember: this isn’t about Canadians vs. Chinese, it’s about people having a right to participate in the decisions that affect their lives.

Additional Information

The ability for corporations to sue foreign governments in private courts, called “investor-state arbitration,” is a controversial practice built into many trade deals like NAFTA that has cost Canada millions and over-ruled democratic decisions, but none impose the level of secrecy in the Canada-China FIPA.

Incredibly, if BC tries to regulate or block Enbridge’s Northern Gateway Pipeline, Sinopec, another Chinese state-owned oil company with investments in Canada’s natural resource infrastructure, may be able to sue for damages, and we may never even hear about it the case or the details of the results.5,6

Other countries like India, South Africa and Australia are moving away from this kind of trade deal. Last year Australia rejected investor-state arbitration due to concerns that it would “constrain the ability of Australian governments to make laws on social, environmental and economic matters”.7,8

The BC Union of Indian Chiefs has also written an open letter to Prime Minister Harper condemning the Canada-China FIPA. They begin their letter: On behalf the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, we are writing to firmly express, advise and direct the Government of Canada to reject the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement with China as the Government of Canada has breached its fiduciary duty to consult First Nations on our respective constitutionally-enshrined and judicially-recognized Aboriginal Title, Rights and Treaty Rights.9

The Chiefs of Ontario have also written to both Prime Minister Harper and China’s Ambassador to Canada advising that the Canada-China FIPA investment deal violates First Nation Treaty rights and international law, and should be postponed indefinitely, pending nation-to-nation discussions between Canada and First Nations.10,11

Why is Canada moving backwards?

Sources:

  1. Canada-China Investment Deal Allows for Confidential Lawsuits Against Canada (Toronto Star)
    http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1264290–canada-china-investment-deal-allows-for-confidential-lawsuits-against-canada

  2. Tories quietly table Canada-China investment treaty (Globe and Mail)
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/tories-quietly-table-canada-china-investment-treaty/article4573635/

  3. Battle over CNOOC’s proposed Nexen Takeover Heats Up In Ottawa (Financial Post)
    http://business.financialpost.com/2012/09/17/battle-over-cnoocs-proposed-nexen-takeover-heats-up-in-ottawa/

  4. Ottawa extends it review of CNOOC’s nexen bid (The Globe and Mail)
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/ottawa-extends-its-review-of-cnoocs-nexen-bid/article4604093/

  5. Chinese Companies Can Sue BC for Changing Course on Northern Gateway, says Policy Expert
    http://www.vancouverobserver.com/sustainability/chinese-companies-can-sue-bc-changing-course-northern-gateway-says-policy-expert

  6. Chairman Harper and the Chinese Sell-Out (The Tyee)
    http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2012/10/11/Chairman-Harper/print.html

  7. Trading our way to more jobs and prosperity (Government of Australia)
    http://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/trade/trading-our-way-to-more-jobs-and-prosperity.html#investor-state

  8. Multiple Countries Rejecting Investor State Dispute Settlement (Janet M Eaton, PhD)
    http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/main-page/multiple-countries-rejecting-investor-state-dispute-settlement

  9. Open Letter: Canada – China Agreement Abrogates Rights of Indigenous People (Union of BC Indian Chiefs)
    http://www.ubcic.bc.ca/News_Releases/UBCICNews10311201.html

  10. China Canada FIPA – Chiefs of Ontario Letter to PM Harper
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/112459570/

  11. China Canada FIPA – Chiefs of Ontario Letter to China’s Ambassador
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/112459565/

Malaysia Could Delay TPP Pact

Posted on by
By Chua Guan Cheong   http://www.bt.com.bn   Saturday, August 24, 2013
BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN
MALAYSIA’S decision to conduct two cost-benefit analyses on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) could delay the signing of the agreement, which was originally slated to be concluded by October this year.
According to reports by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), Malaysia’s federal Cabinet has agreed to two cost-benefit analyses aimed at equipping Malaysian negotiators with additional information as they seek to safeguard the broader interests of all stakeholders in the country.
The WSJ wrote that one study will focus on the overall impact of the trade agreement on Malaysia’s national interest. The other will examine how the interests of small and medium enterprises (SME) and businesses owned by bumiputras (indigenous people) would be affected if the TPP comes into effect.
“The only way to convince the stakeholders is to do a cost-benefit analysis and send a message that, even though there are some short-term losses, in the long run the country is going to benefit,” the WSJ quoted Singapore-based Sanchita Basu Das, a lead researcher in economic affairs at the ASEAN Studies Centre, as saying.
Last month, the 18th round of negotiations was conducted in Malaysia’s Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. According to the WSJ, some thorny issues such as the diminished role of state-owned enterprises in the post-TPP market had sparked resistance in Vietnam and Malaysia, where government-backed companies are deeply entrenched in the economy.
“The Cabinet is of the view that Malaysia should not be bound by any fixed timeline with regard to the TPP,” a statement last week from Malaysia’s Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) said.
According to The Malay Mail, high on the priority is the concern that Malaysia will have to sacrifice its affordable, government-regulated health care and medicine.
“The Cabinet is firm in ensuring access to affordable medicine remains its utmost priority, which will not be compromised in the ongoing TPP negotiations,” the MITI said in the statement.
Negotiators of all 12 TPP countries — Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, Australia, Peru, Vietnam, Malaysia, Mexico, Canada, Japan — are currently in the Sultanate for the 19th round of TPP negotiations.
The ministers of the TPP countries met yesterday and Thursday to discuss how best to address key outstanding issues to meet the October time frame, seemingly to coincide with American President Barack Obama’s visit to the region.
While the general sentiments among stakeholders in all 12 countries seem to point to an uneasiness about the secrecy surrounding the TPP discussions, with minimal information being disclosed after more than three years and 18 rounds of negotiations. US Trade Representative Michael Froman told Bruneian media on Wednesday that “this is among the most transparent processes of any international negotiations we have seen”.
Froman was quoted by The Brunei Times as saying: “We in the United States consult very pro-actively with our Congress … at every stage in the negotiation process, including before we take on any proposals.”
The Brunei Times

Trans-Pacific Partnership will not interfere with sovereignty

Posted on by

By  Debbie Too      http://www.bt.com.bn  Saturday, August 24, 2013

BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN

THE comprehensive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) will not compromise a nation’s sovereignty, and laws that are perceived to be “a disguised form of trade restriction” can be challenged.

The dispute settlement provisions in the TPP are expected to hold governments accountable to corporations and would be heard by offshore tribunals.
At a press conference yesterday at the International Convention Centre (ICC), where ministers of member countries held the 19th round of negotiations, United States Trade Representative Ambassador Michael Froman said there is nothing in the TPP that will prevent a country from adopting or applying regulations on health and safety.
“It is an important act of sovereignty to be able to do that,” he said. In regard to the dispute mechanism, Froman pointed out the TPP has not yet been signed and that only draft proposals have been made. “In a number of trade agreements there are a number of provisions that allow for challenges if a regulation is being used as a disguised form of trade restriction,” he said, when asked about dispute mechanisms in relation to Brunei’s strict tobacco regulations.
YB Pehin Orang Kaya Pekerma Dewa Dato Seri Setia Lim Jock Seng, Second Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade, added to the statement saying that if (Brunei) has certain health issues, it will be something that “will be worked out”, but he does not believe it will pose a problem.
“Essentially, what we are doing with the TPP is producing a very high-standard free trade agreement and the question really is for Brunei, and all of us, and it will be bring a lot of benefits and that’s why we are all here,” said YB Pehin Dato Lim when asked what Brunei stood to gain from the trade pact. A member of the Japanese press asked how TPP member countries would strike a balance between coming up with comprehensive rules for the agreement and protecting each country’s identity when it came to sectors such as agriculture, state-owned enterprises and global rules prohibiting certain industries.
New Zealand Trade Minister Tim Groser said the negotiations for the TPP are “no different from any negotiation that any of (the ministers) had previously participated in”.
He said the visiting trade ministers understood that there were highly sensitive issues regarding agriculture and market access. He pointed out that the delegates have had years of practical experience handling “these sensitivities” and that no one would be pushed into a corner.
“We all understand that we want to be here long-term. Nothing has changed in that respect. We are now trying to find a politically mature way to get towards the long-term goals set out by our leaders,” he said, adding that the combination of traditional modalities and their experience would help ministers achieve a “perfectly sensible transition”. Groser added that it could take many years and a great deal of flexibility before the TPP was signed but that the ministers’ goals are similar.
International media convened at the press conference hall of the ICC yesterday, and asked ministers about topics such as intellectual property, the protection of state-owned businesses and agriculture.
Ministers met over the last two days to address key outstanding issues and published a joint statement yesterday. It added that negotiations were heading towards a comprehensive, high-standard regional trade and investment agreement, which is now in the “advanced stage”.
Key issues that have been discussed included market access of goods, services, investment, financial services and government procurement, as well as the text covering intellectual property, competition and environmental issues.
“They also discussed the remaining outstanding issues regarding labour, dispute settlement and other areas,” the statement said. It added that this round of TPP negotiations had offered guidance to negotiators and were designed to push negotiations to meet the 2013 time frame.
Froman said: “We discussed how best to achieve an outcome consistent with our common goal in achieving an ambitious and balanced 21st century agreement that will enhance trade among us.”
The Brunei Times

Canadian organizations issue open letter to demand action on Russia’s antigay laws

Posted on by

 

by Craig Takeuchi on Aug 23, 2013 http://www.straight.com

Shutterstock

Over 100 Canadian organizations have signed an open letter demanding action on Russia’s antigay legislation. (For more on this story, see this article.)

Here is a copy of the letter.

SPEAK OUT AGAINST HATE, STAND UP FOR HUMAN RIGHTS:
AN OPEN LETTER FROM CANADIAN ORGANIZATIONS REGARDING HOMOPHOBIA IN RUSSIA AND THE SOCHI 2014 WINTER OLYMPICS AND PARALYMPICS

August 22, 2013

CALL FOR ACTION BY THE:

GOVERNMENT OF CANADA
The Right Hon. Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada
The Hon. John Baird, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada
The Hon. Bal Gosal, Minister of State for Sports of Canada
The Hon. Chris Alexander, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration of Canada

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE & INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE
Mr. Jacques Rogge, President, International Olympic Committee
Sir Philip Craven, President, International Paralympic Committee
CANADIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE & CANADIAN PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE
Mr. Marcel Aubut, President, Canadian Olympic Committee
Mr. Gaétan Tardif, President, Canadian Paralympic Committee

SOCHI 2014 MEDIA BROADCASTER
Mr. Hubert Lacroix, President, CBC/Radio-Canada

SOCHI 2014 CORPORATE SPONSORS
Mr. Muhtar Kent, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Coca-Cola Company
Mr. Thierry Breton, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Atos
Mr. Andrew N. Liveris, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Dow
Mr. Jeff Immelt, Chief Executive Officer, GE
Mr. Don Thompson, President and CEO, McDonalds
Mr. Stephen Urquhart, President and CEO, Omega
Mr. Kazuhiro Tsuga, President, Panasonic
Mr. A.G. Lafley, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, P&G
Mr. Oh-Hyun Kwan, Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Samsung
Mr. Charles Scharf, Chief Executive Officer, VISA

Dear Sirs:

We, the undersigned Canadian civil society organizations, call upon you to stand against the rising tide of hate against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in Russia, by taking the actions listed below. We are deeply troubled by the ongoing and intensifying attacks against LGBT, not least those led and encouraged by President Vladimir Putin and the federal Parliament (Duma). These actions include, most recently, the unanimous adoption of a federal law banning the distribution of “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations” (Federal Law № 135-FZ of June 29, 2013).

This law means LGBT people risk prosecution simply for exercising their freedom of expression and association, as does anyone who defends the human rights of LGBT people or even mentions the existence of LGBT people in an approving fashion. Attending an LGBT event could be illegal. Challenging the harassment or assault of LGBT students in a school or declaring that it’s perfectly legitimate to be LGBT could amount to “gay propaganda” under the wording of the law.

Individuals can be fined up to 100,000 rubles (about US$ 3000) for using the media or Internet to “promote non-traditional relations.” Organizations can be fined up to 1 million roubles (about US$ 30,000) and closed down for up to 90 days. The law authorizes police officers to arrest foreign nationals they suspect of being LGBT or “pro-gay” and jail them for up to 15 days before expelling them from the country. Russian officials have already arrested gay foreigners.

There have been other recent legislative and physical assaults on LGBT people in Russia. Moscow’s city government has banned Pride parades for 100 years, which the European Court of Human Rights has declared violates the European Convention on Human Rights. As a precedent for the federal law recently adopted by the Duma, the city of St. Petersburg has enacted a ban on “homosexual propaganda,” as have numerous regions. Russia has also banned adoption of children by any parents from nations that grant equal marriage rights to same-sex couples.

The latest “anti-propaganda” law is part of a much broader, ongoing attack to shut down civil society, including a series of laws that violate freedoms of assembly, association, expression and information, not just for LGBT people but for a whole range of communities and human rights defenders. Homophobia is another weapon being deployed in a broader effort to stifle a free, open, democratic society. Targeting a group to be scapegoated is aimed at weakening any civil society opposition and
maintaining control.

Such legislative hate-mongering does indeed foment further abuses. Anti-LGBT violence is rampant and worsening in Russia. Earlier this summer, a violent mob attacked a small group of LGBT rights demonstrators in St. Petersburg. LGBT youth and adults are being assaulted and tortured by thugs who then broadcast video recordings of these attacks online. So far, Russian authorities have turned a blind eye to such hate crimes, even though some perpetrators are easily identifiable. In a recent incident, two attackers savagely beat a man, crushing his ribs, sodomizing him with beer bottles and attempting to burn him alive, after they learned of his sexual identity. They declared that it was their “patriotic duty to kill a gay man.”

Twenty years ago, at the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights, Russia joined with other countries in declaring that the protection and promotion of human rights “is the first responsibility of Governments.” Yet in this climate of state-sponsored hatred and violence, Russia will host the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games in Sochi in February 2014. The Russian government’s active persecution of LGBT people flies in the face of not just international human rights law but the ostensible spirit of the Olympic Games. The international community, those countries and organizations participating in the Games, and those corporations profiting from the Games, cannot stand idly by in the face of state sponsored terror against millions of its own people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender and against their partners, families, friends and loved ones.

Therefore, in solidarity with our LGBT brothers and sisters in Russia, we call upon the Government of Canada, the International and Canadian Olympic Committees, as well as corporate sponsors and media broadcasters of the Sochi Winter Olympics, to take action as follows:

• The Government of Canada should:

  1. continue to speak out publicly against Russia’s anti-gay legislation and homophobic and transphobic violence being visited upon LGBT people in Russia, and continue to communicate its objections directly to Russian authorities at the highest levels;
  2. add the sponsors of anti-LGBT legislation in Russia to the list of those banned from obtaining visas to enter Canada;
  3. identify opportunities to proactively support LGBT rights advocates in Russia in defending basic human rights;
  4. oppose the “traditional values” resolution being advanced by Russia at the UN, which is a patent attempt to cloak bigotry and hate in the legitimacy of a Human Rights Council resolution; and
  5. use this opportunity to publicly announce its commitment to ongoing support for the UN’s recently launched “Free and Equal” initiative for LGBT rights.

• The International Olympic Committee (IOC) and International Paralympic Committee (IPC) should:

  1. host Pride House in Sochi during the 2014 Winter Olympics and Paralympics;
  2. speak out during the opening and closing ceremonies of the Games against anti-LGBT violence and against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, including legislative discrimination such as Russia’s; and
  3. include explicit reference in their respective Charters to discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity as incompatible with the Olympic and Paralympic Movements, as is already done with grounds such as race, gender and religion. (We note and welcome that the Paralympic Movement has already included sexual orientation.)

• The Canadian Olympic Committee (COC) and Canadian Paralympic Committee (CPC) have authority over Canada’s representation at the Olympic and Paralympic Games. The leadership and athletic delegations of the COC and CPC should:

  1. publicly and privately support, without reservation, any individual athletes, whether they identify as LGBT or not, who choose to use their opportunities at the Games (e.g., when accepting medals) to display their support for the rights of LGBT people;
  2. issue a statement condemning homophobic laws and anti-LGBT violence in Russia;
  3. participate visibly as the Canadian delegation in the Sochi Winter Pride events being organized by Russian LGBT activists;
  4. offer to join the IOC and IPC in hosting Pride House at the Games; and
  5. use the opening and closing ceremonies of the Games to visibly support LGBT human rights as a country delegation.

• Corporate sponsors of the Sochi Games, including the top 10 sponsors named above, should:

  1. publicly state their opposition to Russia’s homophobic legislation and anti-LGBT violence in Russia;
  2. withdraw their sponsorship of the Games unless the Russian government abolishes the “anti-propaganda law” and guarantees freedom of expression, association, assembly and information, including for LGBT people; and
  3. publicly redirect a significant portion of those sponsorship funds, through independent foundations and multilateral initiatives, to support the defense and promotion of LGBT rights, and human rights more broadly, in Russia.

• The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), as exclusive Canadian broadcaster of the Sochi Games, should:

  • commit to reporting, before, during and after the Sochi Games, on human rights abuses in Russia, including against LGBT people, other minorities and political dissidents targeted by the Russian government.

ENDORSED BY:
Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network
AIDS ACTION NOW!
ARC International
Egale Canada

Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC)
ACCM (AIDS Community Care Montreal)
Action Canada for Population and Development (ACPD)
Action positive VIH/sida
African and Caribbean Council on HIV/AIDS in Ontario (ACCHO)
AIDS Committee of Guelph & Wellington County
AIDS Committee of Newfoundland & Labrador
AIDS Committee of Ottawa
AIDS Committee of Simcoe County
AIDS New Brunswick, Inc.
AIDS Saint John
AIDS Vancouver Island
AIDS-Free World
BC Civil Liberties Association
BC Coalition of People with Disabilities
Black Coalition for AIDS Prevention (Black CAP)
Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies
Brockville Pride, Fight Homophobia & Transphobia in Brockville
CACTUS Montréal
Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network (CAAN)
Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange
Canadian Anthropology Society
Canadian Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (CANAC)
Canadian Association of University Teachers
Canadian Federation for Sexual Health
Canadian Harm Reduction Network
Canadian Labour Congress
Canadian Public Health Association
Canadian Treatment Action Council (CTAC)
Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE)
Canadian Working Group on HIV and Rehabilitation (CWGHR)
Canadians United against Discrimination at the 2014 Sochi Olympics
Casey House Hospice
CAW Canada
Central Alberta AIDS Network Society
Centre for Inquiry Canada
COCQ-SIDA (Coalition des organismes communautaires québécois de lutte contre le sida)
Dream Bridge Exchange
Equal Marriage For Same-Sex Couples
Equitas – International Centre for Human Rights Education
Feminist Alliance in Solidarity for Sex Workers’ Rights
FIRST Decriminalize Sex Work
Gerald and Maas
Grandmothers Advocacy Network (GRAN)
HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario
HIV North Society
HIV/AIDS Regional Services
ICASO
Institute for International Women’s RightsManitoba Inc.
Inter Pares
Interagency Coalition on AIDS and Development (ICAD)
Jer’s Vision
Lucky Iron Fish Project
M.A.IN.S. (Mouvement d’Aide et d’INformation Sida)
Méta d’Âme
Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic
Northern HIV and Health Education Society
Nova Scotia Rainbow Action Project (NSRAP)
Ontario Aboriginal HIV/AIDS Strategy
Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL)
Ontario HIV Treatment Network
Ontario Humanist Society
OPSEU Rainbow Alliance
Our City of Colours
Out On The Shelf
Pacific AIDS Network
Parksville/Qualicum KAIROS
Peel HIV/AIDS Network
PFLAG Canada
PFLAG Canada, Brockville
PFLAG Canada, Durham region
Portail VIH/sida du Québec
Positive Living Society of British Columbia
Pride Toronto
Queer Ontario
Rainbow Health Network
Reclaim Our Democratic Canada
REZO, health and well-being of gay and bisexual men
Saskatchewan Public Health Association
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Conference of the Canadian Bar AssociationStella, l’amie de Maimie
The Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario (ETFO)
The Fort McMurray LGBTQmunity
The Legal Clinic of Guelph and Wellington County
The McLeod Group
The Toronto Sisters, Abbey of the Divine Wood
The United Church of Canada
Toronto PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays
Toronto Queer Arts Festival
Toronto Queer West Arts Centre
Unit for Critical Research in Health (UCRH), School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
United Steelworkers
University of Guelph
University of Ottawa Research Chair in Forensic Nursing
Vancouver AIDS Society
Vancouver Island Persons Living with HIV/AIDS Society (VPWAS)
Vanier Community Service Centre
West Coast Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (West Coast LEAF)
Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund
WorldPride 2014 Human Rights Conference
YouthCO HIV & Hep C Society

You can follow Craig Takeuchi on Twitter at twitter.com/cinecraig. You can also follow the Straight’s LGBT coverage on Twitter at twitter.com/StraightLGBT.